Anonymous ID: 05bd58 Dec. 11, 2019, 2:49 p.m. No.7483628   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3650

OK, everyone who knows about it knows that , ya, I do think he looks good.

so that taints my opinion and makes me stupid in regards to him.

but here is a joke, an idea for a meme

 

a snarky cat meme

shreking girl:

why won't . . . . . date me

snarky-cat:

he's too busy dating himself.

Anonymous ID: 05bd58 Dec. 11, 2019, 3:12 p.m. No.7483754   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7483723

I don't have it in me to use the word 'bitch', or pejoratives that snarky cat uses in the memes created by others who use this format. I have to admit that those memes make me laugh and I thought 'why not use this format for a meme'.

but I guess I don't have the personality to make it gutwrenchingly funny.

It's a sports car of a meme format for humorous snark of a dark nature, and I don't take it out of first gear.

Anonymous ID: 05bd58 Dec. 11, 2019, 3:25 p.m. No.7483823   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7483771

if the list has everyone's name on it, what are they supposed to do with that list?

here we are, believing in free speech and democracy, imagine that.

Anonymous ID: 05bd58 Dec. 11, 2019, 3:32 p.m. No.7483883   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7483760

every bread when people mention where the facts point in the 'strange kerning' gaslighting and falsification of the information, and suppression of notables, has gone on.

there is no way to know who or why until we have an investigation.

Q told us that 'Misspellings matter' but did not say that they were his doing.

also these misspellings and strange kernings happen not just in government documents.

Anonymous ID: 05bd58 Dec. 11, 2019, 4:24 p.m. No.7484253   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4281

>>7483876

This is yet another example of a shill who can't stop gaslighting the respell-strange-kerning issue.

 

the supression of this information has continued since this post:

>>7466735 (pb)

which was on Monday.

some of the bakers and note takers have made a point of supressing this information by not including it in notables.

Anonymous ID: 05bd58 Dec. 11, 2019, 4:28 p.m. No.7484290   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4318 >>4348

>>7484226

Has to be willful.

the kerning is what proves that.

also the amount of attention that shills have given to suppress this information gives evidence that they are alarmed that this 'technique' will become widely known.

 

there wouldn't be so much chatter about it if it weren't a real revelation.

 

as Q said : Misspellings are important

Anonymous ID: 05bd58 Dec. 11, 2019, 4:33 p.m. No.7484331   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4342

>>7484311

here is a revelation for you: the issue has been beat to death for two days.

All who have eyes on know that it's not 'just OCR'.

and shills have gaslighted this and suppress the information by not including relevant posts in Notables, meanwhile including gatekeeper false-authority posts that belittle and critize those who have basically proven that what was done was willful tampering with documents, possibly without the authors even knowing.

This goes back years, and predates the Q era.

Anonymous ID: 05bd58 Dec. 11, 2019, 4:38 p.m. No.7484349   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7484342

don't blame me if you are going to be a lazy fuck.

I'll give you what I made

 

I've been on this issue since Monday, and it's been a battle. So you do something now.