Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 11, 2019, 9:22 p.m. No.7486754   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6788

LB/PB

>>7486530

>>>7486410

>

>Mathematics and Geometry play a huge role in occult magick

 

FIFY

 

LB/PB

>>7486608

>>>7486507

>

>The cross is an unfolded cube.

>

>Too bad they won't tell you that too can be unfolded.

 

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam symbols are all based on the Cube.

 

LB/PB

>>7486551

>>>7486411

>

>Well…

>

>You seem interesting.

>

>>When Saturn was forced from the seat of prominence, replaced by the sun of god(creator) the moon entered saturn's old seat, to help return it to prominence.

>

>Otherwise, if you really want to get in to the meat of things, we should discuss why the moon was brought here.

>

>Either way, this explains why Luna is often closely aligned with Ishtar.

>

>Do tell us more, though. You could be fun.

 

I agree with most of what you said. The entire "horned solar disc" is based on the alignments of Saturn, Venus, and Mars during Zep Tepi, or what the Bible calls "The Age that Was". This was interpreted in Japan to look like a Keyhole, and strange "burial sites" are found in this shape throughout Japan. Belonging to what Japan believes to be antiquity, they call these sites "fo koon" - unexplainable mysteries to them.

 

The only thing that explains the ubiquity of the horned solar disc symbol, seen across the world in all cultures, is that this was witnessed across the world as a star alignment in the sky.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 11, 2019, 9:43 p.m. No.7486861   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6913

>>7486773

 

You know nothing of Christianity.

 

 

We are not all a part of the Creator. The Bible is explicitly clear on this (God is wholly and entirely distinct from ALL of Creation) and the fact you even suggest otherwise (Animism, Pantheism) demonstrates your near total ignorance of Scripture.

 

>"glaring issues"

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Pick a number and get in line with the rest of the oceans of people who have attempted similar arguments over the past several thousand years.

 

>This isn't to say…..

You don't know Jesus. If you did, you wouldn't say such a thing. Jesus claimed to BE God to the exclusion of the rest of us, meaning He is God and we are His created beings.

 

You have ONLY 3 logical choices on His claim.

  1. He really is God

  2. He is evil cause he is knowingly telling a lie

  3. He is a madman because he isn't God but believed he was and led countless people to live lives based on falsehood.

 

Those are your ONLY choices. If you don't like them, take it up with Jesus since He is the one who made the claim. You don't get to make up words or ideas He never said and build arguments off of those. You either face what He directly claimed about Himself, or you don't. The End.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 11, 2019, 9:59 p.m. No.7486934   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7486913

>I'm not just going to fit in your box.

 

Not my box.

 

You are making your free-will choice. Choices have consequences. Have fun with your "game." Goodbye.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 11, 2019, 10:08 p.m. No.7486956   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7486927

 

Just to add:

"In the beginning, God (Elohim) created the heavens and the earth".

 

First mention of God (El) in the Bible Gen1:1 is Elohim, the plural form of El. Elohim is used with singular (not plural) verb forms. So it isn't "gods" as in a multiplicity of number, but God with internal plurality acting as a singular Godhead.

 

Right there in Gen 1:1. ;)

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 11, 2019, 10:37 p.m. No.7487049   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7075 >>7078 >>7080 >>7092 >>7095 >>7105 >>7172 >>7182 >>7191

>>7486802

>Now if you wanna argue watching the antics of the cabal, I go back to Kennedy…

 

I figured out Pindar whacked Kennedy in the 80's, and by the 90's, I was helping Satanic Ritual Abuse victims. I knew Ted Gunderson. I knew Al Bielek. I knew Jim Marrs. From Looking Glass to Child Trafficking, I have known this shit for DECADES. All this nonsense about "newfags" means NOTHING. Instead of boasting about it - the anons calling themselves "oldfags" - should be embarrassed that it took Q and the Internet to wake them up.

 

Oldfag and newfag is irrelevant. What the fuck were any of you doing about the Cabal PRIOR to October, 2017? Because all of this childish arguing over oldfag/newfag looks pretty goddamned ignorant to those of us who have been lecturing, writing books, and producing documentaries and Youtube videos for the last 3 DECADES while most of you guys were too young to care, or too asleep to know the fucking difference.

 

As far as I am concerned, anyone who Q has "woke up" is a newfag.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 11, 2019, 10:49 p.m. No.7487087   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>7487049

>>7487075

>You hit the nail on the head there sunshine.

 

But hey, don't get me wrong. Been working to tip the Consciousness and waiting for the Hundredth Monkey for decades. So welcome aboard, you cack-handed deck apes. You're decades late in boarding. So quit arguing and go swab the fucking decks.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 11, 2019, 11:29 p.m. No.7487187   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7487095

>>>7487049

>

>I appreciate your honesty and your enthusiasm.

>

>I do not appreciate your assumption that we Americans have been asleep or indifferent. I have watched this stupidity for 30+ years and am damn sick and tired of it.

 

Simply put: If the shoe fits, wear it. If it doesn't, then I wasn't talking to/about you. But don't tell me that the masses of asses weren't asleep. They were. To tell someone 25 years ago that the Federal Reserve was neither "Federal" or "Reserve", only got you a deer in the headlights look.

 

Imagine the looks we got decades ago, telling people that the world's leaders were blood drinking cannibals, and that there were tunnels for smuggling children beneath day care facilities. People would literally tell me that I was out of my mind.

 

>>7487120

>Moral of the story:

>

>DO IT Q!

 

On That We All Agree.

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2019, 12:13 a.m. No.7487266   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7297 >>7309

>>7487182

>Knowing about it is one thing.

>

>But being able to actually do something about it, is quite another thing.

 

Why do you think people write books and documentaries?

 

>>7487182

>We are not the ones who devised and implemented "The Plan".

 

Well, duh.

 

>>7487182

>We are the pop corn eaters.

 

I don't agree. Everyone contributes. Q united us to harness the power of the Collective Whole. Half the shit on Twatter waking millions, has it origins on this (or the old) forum.

 

>>7487182

>

>I don't think that anyone posting here can take credit for having done a damn thing about this shit.

 

I don't agree. Without people like Gunderson, Marrs, Bielek, Cooper, and countless other authors and lecturers, the web would be VOID of the very information about the Cabal that every "newfag" embraces, and every "oldfag" was talking about on 4ch. And as another anon pointed out, that is why Q picked 4ch in the first place.

 

Every conspiracy researcher is standing on the shoulders of the conspiracy researcher who came before him. Personally, I stand on the shoulders of people like Myron Fagan and John Robison They were the first two authors that I found. Them and people like Gary Allen.

 

Myron Fagan Exposes The Illuminati (1967 - 2hrs 32min)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrUXPn7HCjM

 

https://archive.org/details/ProofsOfAConspiracyJohnRobison1798

 

https://www.resist.com/Onlinebooks/None_Dare_Call_It_Conspiracy.pdf

 

There have literally been generations of conspiracy researchers. And everyone of us is standing on the shoulders of those who came before us. So your statement is incorrect. Without those who came before us, there would be no audience for Q in the first place.

 

>>7487182

>We would all be fucked if Q team hadn't stepped up to the plate.

 

Well that's obvious.

 

>>7487191

I don't give a fuck what you think.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2019, 12:22 a.m. No.7487282   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7290

>>7487228

>>>7487105

>

>Reptilian bs

 

That's what (((They))) called him. I didn't say I believe it. Learn to read. Beside that, the real point is the whole "reptilian" Bloodline issue. People like Icke have confused it for malevolent aliens, but what it really pertains to is the Bloodline of Cain, Son of the Serpent. The Fake Jews who create the Fake News.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2019, 12:44 a.m. No.7487309   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7342

>>>7487266

>

>No anon is greater than another around here.

>

>Yet, you seem full of self importance.

>

>Old fag, new fag doesn't matter is what started this discussion.

>

>All anons have something to offer.

>

>Get off your high horse.

 

You must read at a 5 grade reading level.

 

Your accusation is false and quite the opposite of what I said. I plainly stated that everyone contributes and that this a chain of conspiracy researchers dating back to John Robison in 1798. If you are reading more into that with your fragile ego, that is your problem, sport. Here is what I said.

 

————————————————

>>7487266

>"I don't agree. Everyone contributes. Q united us to harness the power of the Collective Whole. Half the shit on Twatter waking millions, has it origins on this (or the old) forum."

 

>>7487266

>"There have literally been generations of conspiracy researchers. And everyone of us is standing on the shoulders of those who came before us. So your statement is incorrect. Without those who came before us, there would be no audience for Q in the first place."

————————————————

 

That's what I said.

 

So if you don't like my comments, you should copy and paste them into OpenOffice and print them out. Next, fold the paper into a paper airplane and fly it up your ass.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2019, 12:57 a.m. No.7487322   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7487290

I'm not saying that "reptilians" couldn't have evolved from something pre-historic, but I personally believe that is not the case, nor the Truth about what the "reptilians" represent. As I said, I believe Icke has "alien reptilians" to be confused with the Bloodline of Cain, Son of the Serpent.

 

Hey, did you know that the FBI, back in 1999, authored a document called Project Meggido? Amongst other things, it equated people who teach "the Serpent Seed Doctrine" with domestic terrorists. Now why would they do that?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2019, 1:23 a.m. No.7487352   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7367

>>7487342

>You just responded to yourself, you idjet!

 

Well, I was eating pizza and typing at the same time and I made a mistake. That's the best you got? You are a little cunt. Go back and look at your initial comment, saying that we are all just do nothing, "popcorn eaters". I was one of 7 people who disagreed with you. Not a single person who posted agreed with you. In case you didn't notice, YOU are the odd man out.

 

>>7487342

>And you act like a shill, so I'm chalking you off as one!

 

Yeah, because that is what shills do…

 

Drop Truth bombs like Myron Fagan and John Robison.

 

I bet you never heard of either of them before.

 

Ain' that right, Sparky?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2019, 2:06 a.m. No.7487414   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7487379

>St Michael would tell you to pray to Jesus

 

Yep.

 

>>7487381

How dare you.

 

>>7487380

There is an alternate explanation to what "us" means. The word translated "God" in every sentence in Genesis 1 is the word "elohiym".

 

ʼĕlôhîym, el-o-heem'; plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative:—angels,

 

For one, "elohiym" –→ "iym" is a plural suffix.

 

"Elohiym" is the plural of "eloah".

 

The definition of Elohiym:

 

ĕlôhîym, el-o-heem'; [b]plural of H433[/b]; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative:—angels, × exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), × (very) great, judges, × mighty.

 

You see that it says "plural of H433"?

 

H433 is Eloah:

ʼĕlôwahh, el-o'-ah; rarely (shortened) אֱלֹהַּ ʼĕlôahh; probably prolonged (emphatic) from H410; a deity or the Deity:—God, god. See H430.

 

And that is because the entire chapter of Genesis 1, is speaking

toward what the ELOHIYM created. And remember, Elohiym

is PLURAL, and the first area of meaning given to the word,

is “gods in the ordinary sense”. When this word is combined

with the article, or is modified by “Lord” or “YHVH”, it

means “The Father God”.

 

Now let's use the Bible to understand the Bible, and

exegetically prove exactly WHO is doing the creating

in Genesis 1.

 

But before doing so, it is necessary to comprehend that the

Creation itself, is an Explication of a higher, dimensional,

Implicate order.

 

It began with the Son of God, who Christ himself

states, (of himself), that HE was the FIRST of God's

creation.

 

Revelation 3:14

And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write;

These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness,

the beginning of the creation of God;

 

Keep in mind, this is Christ speaking, and he is telling

us that HE was the first of God's creation. As we read

on in Revelation, we see that Christ, who was the first

or beginning of God's creation, is then credited with

the creation of all things.

 

Revelation 4:11

Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power:

for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and

were created.

 

So we see that the unfolding or explication of both ourselves

and our World, came from the higher dimensional Implicate Order

from which Christ himself was explicated.

 

This is why the Bible says that the "latter Kingdom will be greater than the former". Because we all pre-existed in our Supernatural forms. God asked Job if he knew where HE was during the former Kingdom:

 

Job 38:7

When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

 

Job doesn't know the answer. Probably hadn't read Jeremiah…where the Bible clearly teaches that we pre-existed.

 

Jer 1:5

Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

 

So I believe that the "us" in GEN 1:26 is literally US, in the Supernatural body of Christ. I believe it is Christ speaking to us in our pre-existence. The Nag-Hammadi, written by the Gnostics, is best known because of what it says about the Archons. But within the Nag Hammadi, the Tri-Partate Tractate speaks to our pre-existence as well.