there is an irony in someone like Hot Wheels, who has a bad streak against this site, producing 'fonts' that are used to spoof and hide. He's got a 'guarantee' that the letters are allslightly different.

I mean, it's so rediculous that the developers spend all this time trying to stop people from sharing, or from knowing or using, instead of doing real things and saying real things, they spend all their time trying to stop everyone else from being able to do that.

"I have a font that I make, but I have nothing real to say to use it for . . . "

>>7487703

if you do your college will loose federal funding . . .

do you own a college?

>>7487703

I should have said 'might'

legitimate criticism is not anti-ethnic.

constant bully that mascarades as legitimate criticism, but is what is called 'harping' isn't about 'message' or 'free speech', it's a bullying technique.

>>7487732

amish guy's been maga the whole time.

it's not his fault someone made him into a sock puppet.

>>7487750

if you don't know what people are conjecturing, how do you expect to ever over come their resistence to a reveal about how the creatures of this universe really behave.

the idea that some people are . . . not who they were . . . is a well known one that goes back generations, and even into antiquity.

It's a common theme of literature.

the other anon is merely extending the genre.

if you can't tell the fiction from the parady from the bullshit, then you aren't a very good literature professor.

>>7487773

why does it have to be a 'clone'?

why can't it just be an 'imposter'?

did I use the adverb 'it' for a person?

I'm not speaking specificially of dear ruth.

listen here is a point that would make a good tact in a fiction on courts and justice.

The make the clone as a 'sex doll' kind of clone (a horrid purpose) and then . . . it's declared a real person so it has rights . . . . and it 'want s to' so the assholes who did it are cleared of that, the clone has a real personality and is a real person, and thus . . . but then the prosocutorial twist at the end:

'well, you had sex with a clone . . . that was under the age of 18 years old . . . '

another point: AI , if declared 'person' are minors.

what the 'handlers' do them might be called 'child abuse'.

I write fiction mostly. Often it applies as conjecture to the real world. but please, be able to tell the difference.

>>7487807

if you made a fullsized 'copy' of a 'lvoed-one' it would have to be treated as a minor child for 18 years . . .

I'm writing fiction, that is often presented as conjecture. I know that I do this, I do it wilfully and I love to banty it about.

I think that a lot of lawyers and politicians do the same kind of thing, but often times, the poorly educated ones, they act as if their fictional narrative has a rock-solid quality to it, as if it's the bedrock of a new age and they are heroic for forcing you to climb their insurmountalbe mountain. If you try to get to the top of it you will most surly either die or be greatly depleted and perhaps fatally injured, and yet they demand you climb up their great big rock-candy mountain of fallacy, march off to the killing fields of rural places and face your maker, they demand. or you are a baadd person.

cloning is stupid. It descriminated against real people. It's based on fetish of fallacy. It's selfishness of jaded psuedo-aristocracy taken to the highest level. It's fantasy-science-fiction as a way of life. It's a rediculous and environmentally wreckless path for future efforts, and it creates cunnundrums and opportunities for exploitation that . . . will need to be dealt with.

but here is the fact: all of that conjecture exists in copius detail in the fiction of science and industry from the last 150 years of literature.

and all of that is 'owned' by some small few.

copyright and patent law is what needs reform.

all this talk of 'clones' is merely a rewrite of an old story that media-hording conglomerates 'own'.

>>7487844

thats for sure.

>>7487858

in your world view anyone who ever say next to someone is the same as the other.

so all the people in a photograph of a stadium crowd would all be as guilty as the worst criminal in the venue.

Or any lawyer who ever took a guilty client, becauce guilty peole have to have lawyers too, is as bad as the person he represents.

you do see the flaw in that way of imagining the morality of others?

the doctor would always become as sick as the patient.

the worst behaved kid in class would set the standard for all the rest.

if one jumped into the lightning to fry himself, all the rest would have to follow along, becuase they would be as foolish and stupid.

grow up with your point of view about morality.

if you look for perfect people you won't find any.

>>7487912

of course they had 'photo-shopping' back then.

there are all kinds of compositing techniques for prints made from negatives. Then when done, you photograph the product.

that will make a negative of the shopped image. You can then say 'this is the original'

if there were a series of them in a sequence, then it would be much harder to do.

when everyone who gets minority status is also a . . . . the system for affirmative action is broken.

I think just to show that it's

'only a movie'

they should all break out into a choral number and do an elaborate coordinated show-dance.

"Well, hello, Ruthie, this is Joe, Ruthie, it's so nice to have you back where you belong"

parts of the floor at the court house are tiled in swastikas wtih grout from the 1920's (meaning it was done in the long ago).

this is in a second story of the building. It's the county deeds office now.

county hacks would never needlessly waste potential graft dollars to retile a perfectly good floor, even if it does have symbols that some find offensive. The country hacks would be more offended to spend the money on something other than a budget that benifits them directly (I'm just imagining).

Impeachment, a musical play

a dance in four steps

there is no step five

there is not step five . . . .no step five . . .

I want to dance . . .

he wants to dance . . .

he wants to dance . . .

they'll be no dancing. Stop it. no dancing . . .

note: this post is an obvious rip off from a bit from a Monty Python movie.

Gretta will now light the second holiday candle

by staring at it intensely

until it bursts into flames . . .

again ripped up from old television skits of a cutting edge nature (back then)