Looking at misspellings on Wikileaks documents.

There is errors from original non-searchable PDF to searchable text.

So we know all previous document searches are likely missing queries. Relate to we have more than we know?

Were these translation mistakes an attack on the site or is it just a deficiency of the software. Did notice a difference between the .gov direct documents not having consistent errors (mistake only involving m in Comey), where as the errors in Wikileaks seems consistent with other words.

But a big question, is this a meaning of you may have the site, but we have the source?

They can corrupt the site, but POTUS has the original uncorrupted sources?

And they cant attack them.

Example Obarna text vs Obama on original pdf.

https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/33719

>>7489524

Called the storm for a reason. The enemy has to be confused thus some collateral damage as well.

I gave up caring and just look at every bit of information. Is it beneficial and solid or is it bs propoganda.

Scrape the enemy for what they give away. They have to tell a little truth before they try to misdirect.