Anonymous ID: d445df Dec. 12, 2019, 9:09 a.m. No.7489021   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9086

>>7489003

Gaetz targeted Hunter Biden's drug problem. If you are unaware of Gaetz's own issues, and use of ad hominem to make his case, then I don't know what to tell you.

 

Yeah, in true Hank fashion, he tipped the island over with a 15 second moment of silence that no one else understood, but the fact is, Hank made a point to Gaetz; "Watch what you want to bring up in conversation in front of everyone hereโ€ฆ"

Anonymous ID: d445df Dec. 12, 2019, 9:13 a.m. No.7489078   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7489042

Gaetz honestly has NO POSITION TO TALK in this regard. They should've given these talking point to another rep like Collins or Jordan. Gaetz should never engage in ad hominem in a public platform, ever.

 

Besides, we're supposed to be better than that.

Anonymous ID: d445df Dec. 12, 2019, 9:18 a.m. No.7489114   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7489086

>You are not seeing the whole picture

Wanna bet? We talked about how @POTUS is using the swamp to drain the swamp (Dersh, Kraft, etc.). @POTUS is the puppet master. I'm not saying that Gaetz doesn't have his appeal with people that like his approach, but that doesn't mean Gaetz is squeaky clean. I'm all about redemption arcs, too, but Gaetz should be more careful when to (if ever) engage in ad hominem. Period.

Anonymous ID: d445df Dec. 12, 2019, 9:45 a.m. No.7489342   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9365

>>7489311

I grew up in an environment of alcoholism. I can assure you, it often leads to the same end.

 

>>7489322

I'm never going to let myself live this down. Please don't rub it in, lol. Honest, honest mistake. As stated earlier, I always got them confused, anyway. Being from GA, originally, I'm usually really good at not making that kind of mistake, but it happens.

Anonymous ID: d445df Dec. 12, 2019, 10:31 a.m. No.7489625   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9641 >>9644 >>9645 >>9670

>>7489397

I had to duck out early yesterday evening when baker tried to hand off. I remember seeing the gun pics, but wasn't paying attention to those posts at the time. However, I will say this. I firmly believe that a "consensus" between Mr. Watkins and persons in Congress has been reached. Doesn't mean the board/site won't be under constant attack, however, I don't think the gov't will step in anytime soon.