Anonymous ID: ad3e7c Dec. 12, 2019, 1:50 p.m. No.7491115   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1152 >>1236

>>7490972

Sauce on 5 years? All I have seen suggests disqualification is permanent:

 

Article I, section 3, clause 7 provides further that โ€œjudgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.โ€

 

law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-2/49-judgment-removal-and-disqualification.html

Anonymous ID: ad3e7c Dec. 12, 2019, 2:11 p.m. No.7491326   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7491256

2017: "During the hearing, Schultz spent nearly three minutes grilling the police chief over the confiscation of a laptop that is connected to an active investigation, going as far as trying to extract a promise that the computer would be returned, a move that if allowed to happen would surely hinder the criminal investigation.

After being told that the laptop was a key piece of evidence in the investigation, Schultz then preceded to publicly threaten the police chief!

The computer in question is being held by police in order to build a case against one of her staffers, Pakistani Imran Awan, who is suspected of being involved in a massive cybersecurity breach that includes โ€œfunneling sensitive congressional data offsite.โ€ Awan is also accused of billing the government four million dollars for work that was never actually conducted."

 

https://www.intellihub.com/debbie-wasserman-schultz-likely-involved-in-massive-cover-up-as-she-is-caught-trying-to-interfere-in-a-criminal-investigation-threatening-police-chief/