dChan
Anonymous ID: 2fd536 Dec. 12, 2019, 9:47 p.m. No.7495205   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5216 >>5277 >>5396 >>5670 >>5673 >>5839 >>5897

Mark Levin's full clip from the Hannity Show TH Night, 12/12, embedded within this article.

 

Mark Levin: "Pelosi Project" To Impeach Trump "Must Become Republican Project" When There Is A Dem President

 

Part 1

 

Mark Levin argues the next Democratic president must be impeached because Republicans and Democrats can't each live under a different constitution. The next Democratic president, if they vote for impeachment, must be impeached Levin said.

 

The nationally syndicated radio host called Democrats phonies for claiming they are upholding the law of the land as they often come from sanctuary cities. He also said Trump is the victim and the House Democrats are the ones who need to be impeached.

 

"Donald Trump is upholding the constitution. Donald Trump is the victim. It is the members of the House of Representatives, the Democrats, they're the ones that need to be impeached," he said Thursday on FNC's 'Hannity.'

 

MARK LEVIN: Let's look at the committee chairmen and the Speaker. You have Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler. What do they have in common? A lot of things. They talk about the rule of law. They come from sanctuary cities that nullify federal law and they support that. They obstruct ICE and law enforcement. They reject our immigration laws and now they're talking about the rule of law.

 

They don't believe in the rule of law. The constitution is the law of the land. Not any these potentates that run these committees and not Nancy Pelosi. It's the president's duty to uphold the constitution, not a rogue House where the Democrats are in control.

 

Literally every president who crosses the House of Representatives in the future, under the standardless procedures they have in place with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress is subject to potential impeachment if they do not bow to the will of the majority in the House of Representatives.

 

First of all, obstruction of Congress, they say, right? Has the Senate done anything yet? So how is it obstruction of Congress? It's obstruction of a rogue faction of radical Democrats in the House of Representatives. Once they won the majority, they immediately ran for impeachment. The president of the United States has no obligation to them…

Anonymous ID: 2fd536 Dec. 12, 2019, 9:47 p.m. No.7495216   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5244 >>5396 >>5670 >>5839 >>5897

>>7495205

Mark Levin's full clip from the Hannity Show TH Night, 12/12, embedded within this article.

 

Mark Levin: "Pelosi Project" To Impeach Trump "Must Become Republican Project" When There Is A Dem President

 

Part 2

 

Let me tell you something: every past president who would be subject to impeachment under the current articles being debated in the House of Representatives. John Adams would be impeached. He shut down newspapers; he imprisoned reporters. Abraham Lincoln would be impeached. He shut down 300 newspapers; he imprisoned reporters. Thomas Jefferson would be impeached. The Louisiana Purchase without budget approval from the Congress. Woodrow Wilson would be impeached. He re-segregated the civil service and he put political opponents and reporters in prison. He would be impeached. The great FDR would be impeached. Internment of Japanese-Americans, Italian-Americans, German-Americans. Took their property, took their homes. Use of the Internal Revenue Service against the 'Philadelphia Inquirer' owner, against the Gannett owner. Used the IRS against his political opponents like Huey Long.

 

FDR would be impeached 25 times. John Kennedy would be impeached, used in the IRS and the FBI against his political opponents, leaked information against them. Lyndon Johnson would be impeached, used the IRS, the FBI, and the CIA, to tap into his political opponents into civil rights leaders. And by the way, became a multimillionaire while he was a Senator. We'd have a lot of impeachment going on under these bogus rules that this rogue House Democrat leadership that has been put in place…

 

The Democratic party needs to be slammed down now! The next Democrat president of the United States must be impeached. Not to get even, not because we are at a low level. But because the Republicans can't live under one constitution when the Democrats live under another constitution. it's the only way we are going to stop them. One party cannot be allowed to abuse the constitution, yet wave it around while the other party sits there and takes it. The Democrat party must be slammed down. The next Democrat president, if they vote for impeachment against President Donald Trump, must be impeached.

 

We have the blueprint; it's the Pelosi project. She even said today, we've been at this for 22 months, for two years. What do you mean we're being fast here? We have the plan: Endless unconstitutional subpoenas. No resort to judicial review. No due process. Accusers are protected from scrutiny. Phone calls with foreign leaders must be released. The president's closest advisers must testify. Tax returns. Bank records. Business associates. All subject to Congressional access. And demand appointment of a special counsel. That's the Pelosi project. It must become the Republican project when there is a Democrat president.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/12/12/mark_levin_pelosi_project_to_impeach_trump_must_become_republican_project_when_there_is_a_dem_president.html

Anonymous ID: 2fd536 Dec. 12, 2019, 11:05 p.m. No.7495567   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5715

>>7495474

And, he was (maybe still is) quite friendly with Biden.

 

So, I agree. He's between a rock and a hard place here.

 

Will be watching him closely, as will POTUS.

 

Would love to hear Q weigh in on this, honestly.

Anonymous ID: 2fd536 Dec. 12, 2019, 11:43 p.m. No.7495691   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5705 >>5723 >>5848

>>7495550

 

This is actually quite Notable

if not notabled already.

 

Having lived in Germany, I immediately knew the name. Bahlsen is one of the largest producers of baked goods like biscuits and cookies in Germany.

 

A little research confirms he is part of that family.

 

German article about his death (using Google translate):

 

Legacy of the Biscuit Empire dies in plane crash

 

According to media reports, Alex Bahlsen, great-grandson of company founder Hermann Bahlsen, died in Canada.

 

Various media reports that Alex Bahlsen, a member of the entrepreneurial Bahlsen family, who among other things produces the famous Leibniz biscuits, died in a plane crash in his adopted home of Canada. He was 61 years old.

 

Alex Bahlsen: He should have flown himself

 

The Canadian newspaper The Vancouver Sun writes that Alex Bahlsen crashed his plane on Gabriola Island west of Vancouver on Tuesday (12 December). The heir of the Bahlsen family was a pilot and is said to have sat at the wheel of the machine himself. The cause of the crash is still unclear. How many people were on board is also unknown. The machine is said to have been on the return flight from Mexico. Alex Bahlsen lived with his wife in Mill Bay near the crash site. He intended to land on a strip of air nearby. Witnesses told The Times Colonist newspaper that the machine crashed to the ground in a "giant blast."

 

He was considered an experienced pilot

 

According to Bild, Alex Bahlsen has been living in Canada for more than 30 years. First near Calgary and last year near Vancouver. He worked as a pilot and is described as very experienced. Rasmus Rydstrøm-Poulsen, a friend of German, said that Alex Bahlsen was a very good pilot. He believes in a machine failure as a crash cause. "He was a very, very good flight instructor," said Rydstrøm-Poulsen to "The Vancouver Sun". Alex Bahlsen is described as a very likable, modest person who was happiest in the cockpit of an airplane.

 

https://www.gala.de/stars/news/l_a__news/alex-bahlsen—61—erbe-des-keks-imperium-tot-nach-flugzeugabsturz-22191878.html

Anonymous ID: 2fd536 Dec. 13, 2019, 12:04 a.m. No.7495719   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5724 >>5737

>>7495715

 

Agree with you completely, Anon. I too, thought he flipped after McStain was gone. Was happy with him until very recently. Recent statements, wishy-washiness, and his statements about relationship with Biden all make me question his alliance now.

 

>>>7495567 (You)

>

>Think he is key, did he flip or did he take over as the distributor of funds to the lower lackeys.

>

>Half a year ago I was starting to think that with no name gone he was going to go straight but recently it seems as he is just burning time. "I will call in … to testify, to well after the impeachment hearing"