>>7497296 pb

Another ShakSper reference?

DUNham

DUNcan

Duncan was the name of the man (in the "play") who got revenge on the evil cursed King Killer..Ironic the "hero" & name-sake of the Play.

Inversion.

>>7497178 pb

7497514 pb

Maybe, but the thought that Militias could beat the State if the Cabal got re-control of U.S. Military?

Why even go there?

That's a pipe dream. Get over it.

That's why the military is there. For us and for POTUS

That's why the control of communication and Military are two essential elements.

Otherwise, you are a discouragement fag.

One of many.

It's reminiscent of the rank and file Antifaa thinking they can "topple the State" with sticks and stones.

Best to stay back until you know you can win, and can trace the path to that.

Learn military strategy. That is a basic point.

"Art of War"

Don't fight just for the sake of it.

You don't prove anything with that.

Prudence before Valor.

"The better part of valour is discretion" King Henry 4 , ShakSper

>>7497525

So it's the corrupt SCOTUS chief . The one who picked the FISA and didn't discipline them nor call foul this whole time?

He gets to be the presiding Judge.

Wow, just wow.

>>7497670

>>7497689

>>7497718

I see. Then who decides on issues of procedure?

He presides. So he's the umpire?

Who decides if any witnesses are called?

>>7497749

So if there is a disagreement the Umpire decides, which is what I wrote.

So it's just going to be another "Let's pummel DJ Trump" fest if the defense decides not to bring witnesses? Or if they are not allowed?

>>7497749

>>7497714

Practically it's more like 3 days than one moment.

3 days right in a row are very close to the same length.

"sleeps for 3 days" the Sun

>>7497811

A trial is quasi-legal no matter how you try to twist language.

Someone will decide if there is a disagreement. And I claim that would be Roberts, as Umpire.

Jim Stone, thinks they are so desperate they might pull a number as they did to pass the legislation enpowering and liscensing the Central Private bank "FED"

If Republicans go home over break enemies can sneak it through?

"

NOT GOOD ENOUGH:

Two unidentified congressmen saying Trump will be acquitted by McConnel instantly DOES NOT CUT IT. Pay attention and make damn sure they don't scam Trump out over Christmas. This is such an obvious move I can't believe people missed the possibility.

Graham is so useless he's damn near pervert useless, slamming Trump left and right, and Trump can't call witnesses to the senate after being blocked from doing so by top republicans. That's all that matters, IT SAYS IT ALL.

When troubleshooting a problem, things become very clear when all the "maybes" are ousted and you narrow it down to the key facts. The critical key fact is TRUMP CANNOT CALL WITNESSES to the Senate. Why? That's not how an honest proceeding goes."

The last times its was bipartisan. This will be different

It not a criminal trial because all they need are votes, not evidence.

In this case the defendant has the votes.

So we are looking at another "show trial" if anything?

Unless there's a lot of sleepers and Rhinos?