Anonymous ID: b16cd7 Dec. 13, 2019, 9:37 p.m. No.7502676   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2702 >>2721

>>7502549

>>7502507

Until you division fags give some sauce and not speculation, you mine as well go piss in the wind.

 

Every defense lawyer that defends a pedo is complicit? That's where we are at with this logic? Lawfag here, learn the rules of ethics for lawyers. Cannot send a witness on the stand if you know he is lying. Lawyers wants the relevant facts but also are risking their own ability to practice law. Dershowitz is one of the best. Of course he is called by those with large sums of money. In other words, he has an inclination of where the bodies are buried just as easy as he is what you faggots are inferring.

Anonymous ID: b16cd7 Dec. 13, 2019, 9:54 p.m. No.7502756   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7502702

Welcome to the legal world, full of moral dilemmas. The US Constitution requires Due Process, meaning we must have defense attorneys. From the free market point of view, the US system cultivates an environment that prizes very great legal defense attorneys and pays them large sums of money. From the Biblical point of view, Jesus Christ ridiculed the scribes and pharisees for withholding truth from people.

 

Is Dershowitz presently protecting evil by what he has been doing for the past two to three years? How about what he did overseas in Ukraine in defending certain people? By your own logic, he is doing the opposite of protecting evil at the present moment by going against the grain. So dersh different? Apparently so.

Anonymous ID: b16cd7 Dec. 13, 2019, 10 p.m. No.7502792   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2809

>>7502721

Again, speculation. However, here's my speculation, he has in fact been accused now and is fighting it. Would the person (Epstein) being defended implicate him if things turned sideways in the future? Why not protect yourself just in case that would happen?

Anonymous ID: b16cd7 Dec. 13, 2019, 10:02 p.m. No.7502793   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7502721

Again, speculation. However, here's my speculation, he has in fact been accused now and is fighting it. Would the person (Epstein) being defended implicate him if things turned sideways in the future? Why not protect yourself just in case that would happen?

Anonymous ID: b16cd7 Dec. 13, 2019, 10:09 p.m. No.7502823   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7502809

Okay. Reconcile? Disinformation is necessary. Why is Alan cut a deal better than no deals? Q specifically said No Deals. On the other hand, one has to make an inference from that post to believe Alan cut a deal.