if you're the same one who called out "baker fuckery" lb bc baker did not pick up some "class B" (possible) notables:
this is NOT fuckery, just baker choosing not to pick up all of the POSSIBLE notables
That's why they were "possibles"
Got notables? You repost em not baker
Why would NBC publish this kind of opinion piece? Interdasting.
The articles of impeachment show Democrats are the ones obstructing justice
The House could have taken Trump to court over blocking officials' testimony and literally checked his privilege instead
Dec. 13, 2019
By Jeremy Lott
Friday the 13th is a good day to be on the lookout for ghoulish behavior, and Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee delivered. On a straight party line vote of 23-17, the committee approved two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.
The first article, about abuse of power, is a judgment call and I’m not going to litigate it here. The second article about “obstruction of Congress,” however, is absurd.
There are many echoes of Watergate in this impeachment effort — but they generally showcase just how short this effort is of that one.
In undertaking the impeachment inquiry, the House Democratic leadership wanted to interview many White House officials, but they refused on the grounds of executive privilege. Now, the second article charges that Trump should be impeached because he “has directed the unprecedented, categorical, and indiscriminate defiance of subpoenas issued by the House of Representatives.”
If you are the leadership of the House of Representatives and you face a claim of executive privilege from the president that is making your impeachment inquiry harder, here’s what you need to do instead of jumping straight to impeachment: You take that claim to court. And then, very likely the courts agree with you and, together, you literally check Trump’s privilege by compelling the testimony that you seek.
If at that point the president continues to press the matter, without any legal basis, THEN you add it as an article of impeachment. Practically all reasonable people (including this conservative analyst) will agree with you. That’s how you build the popular and political support to actually remove the president….
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/articles-impeachment-show-democrats-are-ones-obstructing-justice-ncna1101981
Project Looking Glass & recent article on declassifying black space programs
Listened to first part of this vid:
David Wilcock SECRET SPACE PROGRAMS: Declassified in 2020?
At 21:20 in Wilcock vid, he talks about Project Looking Glass [PLG] and the 11-11-10 Q post on it (#3585). He summarizes sources to check out on this project here. These are different than the Project Camelot sources mentioned in earlier posts (see Qresear.ch or QRB discussion below).
W says Project Looking Glass is controversial but it is real and the truth will come out.
Then talks about this article saying secret space programs about to be declassified:
Barrett, Rogers consider declassifying secretive space programs"
Dec. 8, 2019
SIMI VALLEY, California — The U.S. Air Force’s top civilian and a key member of Congress agreed Saturday on the need to declassify a large amount of information about America’s military space programs to both intimidate foes and encourage support among the public.
“Declassifying some of what is currently held in secure vaults would be a good idea,” Air Force Secretary Barbara Barrett said during a panel at the Reagan National Defense Forum. “You would have to be careful about what we declassify, but there is much more classified than what needs to be.”
Fellow panelist Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., said he met with the secretary earlier in the week to discuss that very issue, calling the information on space programs “overwhelmingly classified”…..
https://www.defensenews.com/smr/reagan-defense-forum/2019/12/08/barrett-rogers-plan-to-declassify-black-space-programs/
—————
This artice was posted twice on QResearch but never notabled
See CAPP.
See also discussion in QRB on Project Looking Glass:
>>>/qrb/38946, >>>/qrb/38971, >>>/qrb/38973 Q #3654 & Project Looking Glass
>>>/qrb/39507, >>>/qrb/39508, >>>/qrb/39547, >>>/qrb/39548 Q post #3585 & Project Looking Glass (high-tech project or Lewis Carroll allusion?)
>>>/qrb/39601, >>>/qrb/39602, >>>/qrb/39604, >>>/qrb/39625, >>>/qrb/39628 Project Looking Glass, con't.
CAPP for article:
Barrett, Rogers consider declassifying secretive space programs
https://www.defensenews.com/smr/reagan-defense-forum/2019/12/08/barrett-rogers-plan-to-declassify-black-space-programs/
found your posts in qresear.ch
yes–should be notable
Wilcock reads it in his vid >>7504373
article is pretty timely considering the recent Q post on Project Looking Glass
POTUS mentioned space program again in recent rally too
The article says one reason it's hard to get much public support for space program is that it's so highly classified–hence the interest in declas
(Wonder what we will find out when declas happens?)
>alien life: classified
Why does Q bring up stuff like Project Looking Glass? What are we supposed to focus on with it? Until there's declas, everything sounds like a fairytale and to the extent we take it seriously in our discussions, it makes us sound like fringy "frazzle-drippy" wackos.
Makes me wonder whether some kind of declas is imminent. Would involve both space ops and advanced tech, since the two go hand in hand.
>aliens believe in God too
Agree. Important in this discussion not to exclude spiritual dimensions of an expanded view of reality (i.e., it's not just about advanced tech but about the Great Awakening)
there is a delicate relationship between a belief system and expansion of beliefs to include new info
human beings can only absorb new info so fast
(one reason declas etc are taking so long–so people can gradually shift their views)
>>7504793 Hungary's foreign minister highlights the right of EU members to defend the rights of Christian communities
notable
>liberal foreign ministers have often been dismissive whenever he raises the issue of protecting Christian communities.
>>7505049 House Dems spotted at WH Congressional Ball the night before impeachment vote
seconded