I'm not generally a timestamp guy
BUT
this is HIGHLY HIGHLY spoopy interdasting!
Agree it's some kind of comms
Obviously that that anon meant was
they have never seen a screencap of
a Q post FROM Q'S PERSPECTIVE
with the you referring to Q as the anon who posted it.
Time will tell.
There's little point in arguing one way or the other.
Anons study evidence and form tentative conclusions, later revising their conclusions as more evidence develops.
To protect senior member(s) of the Senate Judiciary Committee (Mark Warner) according to Conservative Treehouse's analysis, which I happen to find very persuasive and cogent.
Better re-read the article.
Put on your thinking cap and really study it.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/11/ig-modifies-fisa-report-adds-declassification-aspect-per-doj-barr/