>>7505060 (lb)

BO could def' help.

Given the (you)'s in the background pic on the screen, which are from breads #6914 (Test 11), #6913 (Test 7) & #6912 (Test 5), it means the device the big screen is connected to still had the cookies stored on 03/03.

03/03 is the date bread #7002 was baked, the bread that screenshot on the big screen is from.

This means the drop from Friday 03.01. in bread #6966 was NOT made from that same device. Same with all other Q posts w/o a (you).

The poster hashes should correspond accordingly ....

BO

Can you please confirm that the following posts were all made by the same IP hash/device ?:

>>5408812 (Bread #6914, "Test 11")

>>5408690 (Bread #6913, "Test 7")

>>5407223 (Bread #6912, "Test 5")

That would not give away the ID of poster in last bread with the image (6ed6f266000…..), but it could indirectly show that it is highly unlikely anyone could have shopped it.

>>7505220

>>7505318

Test 1 through 12 from back then were made in four different breads:

Test 1-4 #6885, all same ID 8414bf

Test 5 #6912, ID: 57f18f

Test 6-9 #6913, ID: 94e203, 24436e & 8d054c

Test 10-12 #6914, ID: 0f48d0, 795131 & 009d84

>>7505739

Yes, it's possible. Not a big problem even and not detectable, unless BO would confirm

>>7505407

Even though it could be some custom CSS, I am still wondering about the absence timestamps (date + time) on ALL three devices, while PosterIDs appear colored only on one of them ….