The Articles of Impeachment MUST be taken to the Supreme Court BEFORE going to the Senate.

Here is what our Country could look like January 7 2021

Republicans win the House and keep the Senate

Majority Leaders in both chambers seat all Republicans 1st on Jan 6 2021

They then seat 25 Dems at a time with a pause. They expel the 25 they just seated based on Abuse of Power with a simple majority.

Governors appoint a temporary Senator but must old special elections for Congress members. They seat and expel each Dem as they come forward.

Meanwhile, The Republican controlled House votes on articles of Impeachment for all Liberal Supreme Court Judges.

The Senate convicts and removes them.All based on Abuse of power standards.

The House writes a law saying it is Treason to believe in any opposing belief.

It is successful in Republican controlled Senate and a Republican President signs it into law , upheld by a Republican SC.

All it takes from this point forward is for 1 party to control both chambers and this scenario can play out in less than 24 hours.

>>7513972

>>7513969

sauce https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/11/impeachment

>>7513998 that is why I said these articles of impeachment MUST be taken to Supreme Court BEFORE they go to the Senate!

It is not supposed to work that way but if new standards are allowed then this is what it means to America. There would be nobody to stop it

>>7514001 fuck lazy. It reference the Constitution. It is not an Opinion. You get the Constitution? What part do you have a problem with?

Impeachment requires High CRIMES or Misdemeanors. Abuse of power is not a crime of any kind.

Congress can be expelled not impeached. It requires a simple majority as stated in the Constitution. What part of this do you have a problem with. Insults without specific issues are lame

>>7514040 Opinions written inside the Constitution? There is NO SUCH THING. MOS shill fuck all the way off. I am 100% correct. These articles of Impeachment are unconstitutional and blow up our Constitution. The scenario I laid out is exactly what it would mean to allow this to go to the Senate before the Supreme Court has a chance to say abuse of power is unconstitutional impeachment standards

>>7514073

You have a reading comprehension problem.

I didn't say the Constitution requires it. I said these articles of impeachment are unconstitutional and must go to the SC before the Senate.

If they do not, and abuse of power is adopted as a new standard, we have a Country just like I laid out.

The Constitution says Congress can be expelled by their chambers with a simple majority.

The Constitution says a elected must be seated. There is no place where the Constitution says the must be seated and stay. They can be expelled at any point , including 5 minutes later if the votes are there

Alan Dershowitz describes the abuse of power standard as unconstitutional in the first few seconds of this interview. He says there will not be Judicial overview. This can't be allowed to go forwards without judicial review for

constitutionality of the matter

https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/sports/alan-dershowitz-says-it-would-be-unconstitutional-for-president-trump-to-be-impeached-by-current-inquiry/vi-BBXXbvd