>>7514575 (pb/pQ)

Ya know, with movies, the script you start to follow can change drastically with a new director. A movie is a script that gets made. There can be improvisations and changes as it gets actualized, and if major problems are encountered, the original director can change the script. But despite this, it generally heads towards a determined end. By following the script. Another meaning for us watching the movie (for me anyways) is that the general msm narrative, and not the new narrative of reality, is the movie.

Might be a duh or a derp +/- but this bubbled up in my head again after something Nunes said on the Q-linked video from this morning (below)

Anyways, “we’re watching a movie” has a few signifieds that it points to. The events we are seeing play out (whether the real ones or the hyperreal ones) can both be movies

Nunes:

After Durham and “spy ring” comments, a question about hearing back from CNN re law suit

>Well as predicted, they’re refusing to come to the table

>You can’t make this stuff up

>To create a new media narrative

>Great story CNN, it’s great for Hollywood

All on Sunday Morning /Futures/ (extra emphasis on plural futures)

Is movie talk Project Looking Glass comms?