Anonymous ID: ae7cfc Dec. 15, 2019, 2:01 p.m. No.7517773   🗄️.is 🔗kun

With Q pointing to Durham appointed [publicly] on the day Q started posting, and Durham's statement at precisely 1:29 [watch on 12.9 showing 1:29], this means that Durham is [at the minimum] aligned with Q. But is there more to it? Is Durham part of the Q team?

Anonymous ID: ae7cfc Dec. 15, 2019, 2:14 p.m. No.7517974   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8143

What if Horowitz, Durham and Barr are part the Q team? As Q said, some of us come here just to drop crumbs. Coincidences of mathematical impossibility & total plausible deniability are essential to protect Nat Sec + Optics. Q+=POTUS, B2=Barr, Durham=Punisher?, Horowitz?