Thanks baker
We've been at this for awhile. We've already celebrated 2 Q anniversaries.
Like that one.
Bubbles been showing the goods a lot recently.
Wasn't here last night but I was here the other night when she showed her goodness.
ING?
But Q, if it can be proven by a hostile forces to the plan that you are providing/forcing these coincidences, wouldn't you still get in trouble for violating NAT SEC?
I like that. And if anon/baker who made the original format is around. I'm the anon who said no, never. I'm sorry. It just looked cluttered to me.
SAY WHAT?!?!?
My deepest apologies anon.
You're a hell of a baker and I fired without thinking. You's are important to anons. Keep up the good work.