This was the only thing bringing attention to his lackluster fonts.
Aight, so… this is an example of sticking tooooooo closely to a style.
You've sacrificed aesthetics for dogma.
The better play would just be to have the W in front of the right side instead of this weird half behind thing.
I understand that you don't want to lose the i.
Why not cut it out of the Q?
If you're on a mac and using photoshop, you can hold command and click the thumbnail to select an outline. Then you could either create a mask or duplicate the Q layer and directly cut it out. Execution's your choice.
Here are some examples and the NERDS one could have used a different treatment on the NER_S, but you get the idea.
Outside of the W, it looks like a good layout.
Maybe play with the spacing in the text options for improved kerning near the end.
Better than Fudds standing by…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Mystical_Order_Rosae_Crucis
Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis
Everyone always talks about the Masons…
They have a Rosy Croix degree, but what about the actual Rosicrucians?
Double Cross… Ankh… Downvote…
Downward triangle with a plus in it…
Thoughts?
I'm gonna go ahead and stop you right there.
I found some WTF.
https://hermetic.com/crowley/the-rosicrucian-scandal/index
"A mirror. Two flickering candles. And Sirhan Sirhan. Alone in his cramped room, day after day, hour after silent hour, Sirhan studied Sirhan. Mail order courses in Rosicrucian mysticism had given him a new creed. They told the disturbed Christian Arab that he could unlock from the mirror image of Sirhan Sirhan the inner knowledge, happiness and power he craved."
And, pic related:
https://hermetic.com/crowley/the-rosicrucian-scandal/index
Apparently there was beef between the Rosicrucians and Aleister Crowley?
https://www.100thmonkeypress.com/biblio/acrowley/articles/1911_04_27_daily_news.pdf
"THE DAILY NEWS 27 April 1911
MYSTERIES OF THE ROSICRUCIANS. REMARKABLE EVIDENCE. SECRET CHIEFS AND STRANGE RITES."
More Rosicrucians vs Crowley
What's the point of anything we've been doing our whole lives, in that scenario?
(besides this.)