Anonymous ID: 35d420 March 22, 2018, 1:40 a.m. No.753126   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3150 >>3168

POTUS 6:03 twit deleted. Was he just quoting a misspelling, nothing to see here?

>>753098

>>>753079

>>Didn't see in notable posts about what POTUS twit misspellings mean. Anyone know?

 

>SPECIAL COUNSEL vs SPECIAL COUNCIL

 

>is this another case of "i"?

Anonymous ID: 35d420 March 22, 2018, 1:55 a.m. No.753168   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3176 >>3220 >>3250 >>3289

IS POTUS SIGNALING US MUELLER HAD IMMUNITY? "i"

 

Mar 21, 2018 06:29:03 AM “Special Council is told to find crimes, whether a crime exists or not. I was opposed to the selection of Mueller to be Special Council. I am still opposed to it. I think President Trump was right when he said there never should have been a Special Council appointed because….. [Twitter for iPhone]

Mar 21, 2018 06:11:17 AM …there was no probable cause for believing that there was any crime, collusion or otherwise, or obstruction of justice!” So stated by Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. [Twitter for iPhone]

Mar 21, 2018 06:03:22 AM “Special Council is told to find crimes, wether crimes exist or not. I was opposed the the selection of Mueller to be Special Council, I still am opposed to it. I think President Trump was right when he said there never should have been a Special Council appointed because….. [Twitter for iPhone]

 

Counsel spelled with an "i" as council

POTUS deletes 1st twit then twits it again

>>753126

>POTUS 6:03 twit deleted. Was he just quoting a misspelling, nothing to see here?

>>>Didn't see in notable posts about what POTUS twit misspellings mean. Anyone know?

>>SPECIAL COUNSEL vs SPECIAL COUNCIL

>>is this another case of "i"

 

>>753150

misspelled whether second time around as wether.

 

Do you know why? 1st time "wether" closer to weather as in Storm?

Anonymous ID: 35d420 March 22, 2018, 2:01 a.m. No.753181   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3250

>>753176

I do remember that, I thought immunity, bc another anon noticed that night Q was posting to @Snowden an anon suspected of being Snowden responded about missing "i" & something else, & I do remember when it happened at the time, thought huh, then ignored bc things were moving fast at the time through the thread.

Anonymous ID: 35d420 March 22, 2018, 2:21 a.m. No.753250   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3253 >>3270 >>3272

>>753168

>>753176

>>753181

Here is that run down why I thought of the possibility of immunity.

 

3-8

>>605255

@Snowden

24 Twitter.

A/B or C.

We can take you anytime.

Q

 

3-9

>>605255

>24hrs to respond.

>He did, smartly.

>Public view.

>Q

 

>>605305

>Missing I

 

>>605519

 

>>605273

>>605305

>>1cc844

>Was this Snowden confirmation?

Anonymous ID: 35d420 March 22, 2018, 2:28 a.m. No.753263   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3267 >>3545

>>753230

>We have a huge number of aircraft, large aircraft, flying over California right now that is Asian. China, Japan, Hong Kong. This is a lot of activity. Concentrated in the SF Bay Area.

 

Human Trafficers getting out of dodge?

Anonymous ID: 35d420 March 22, 2018, 2:34 a.m. No.753282   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>753272

Remember, "consequential" deliberately misspelled as "consensual"? There were other letter other than "q", but that is very interesting. If not "i", "si" which is Yes in Spanish, hmm.

Anonymous ID: 35d420 March 22, 2018, 2:43 a.m. No.753319   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>753289

>>753292

I would agree your theory is most likely the answer than it being immunity, bc immunity was based on a response to Q by possibly Snowden & this theory refers back directly to Q.