Didn't see in notable posts about what POTUS twit misspellings mean. Anyone know?
POTUS 6:03 twit deleted. Was he just quoting a misspelling, nothing to see here?
>>>753079
>>Didn't see in notable posts about what POTUS twit misspellings mean. Anyone know?
>SPECIAL COUNSEL vs SPECIAL COUNCIL
>is this another case of "i"?
IS POTUS SIGNALING US MUELLER HAD IMMUNITY? "i"
Mar 21, 2018 06:29:03 AM “Special Council is told to find crimes, whether a crime exists or not. I was opposed to the selection of Mueller to be Special Council. I am still opposed to it. I think President Trump was right when he said there never should have been a Special Council appointed because….. [Twitter for iPhone]
Mar 21, 2018 06:11:17 AM …there was no probable cause for believing that there was any crime, collusion or otherwise, or obstruction of justice!” So stated by Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. [Twitter for iPhone]
Mar 21, 2018 06:03:22 AM “Special Council is told to find crimes, wether crimes exist or not. I was opposed the the selection of Mueller to be Special Council, I still am opposed to it. I think President Trump was right when he said there never should have been a Special Council appointed because….. [Twitter for iPhone]
Counsel spelled with an "i" as council
POTUS deletes 1st twit then twits it again
>POTUS 6:03 twit deleted. Was he just quoting a misspelling, nothing to see here?
>>>Didn't see in notable posts about what POTUS twit misspellings mean. Anyone know?
>>SPECIAL COUNSEL vs SPECIAL COUNCIL
>>is this another case of "i"
misspelled whether second time around as wether.
Do you know why? 1st time "wether" closer to weather as in Storm?
I do remember that, I thought immunity, bc another anon noticed that night Q was posting to @Snowden an anon suspected of being Snowden responded about missing "i" & something else, & I do remember when it happened at the time, thought huh, then ignored bc things were moving fast at the time through the thread.
Here is that run down why I thought of the possibility of immunity.
3-8
>>605255
@Snowden
24 Twitter.
A/B or C.
We can take you anytime.
Q
3-9
>>605255
>24hrs to respond.
>He did, smartly.
>Public view.
>Q
>>605305
>Missing I
>>605519
>>605273
>>605305
>>1cc844
>Was this Snowden confirmation?
Remember, "consequential" deliberately misspelled as "consensual"? There were other letter other than "q", but that is very interesting. If not "i", "si" which is Yes in Spanish, hmm.