This lawsuit doesn't have legal standing, from what I can tell in the research I've done.
>>752890
>>752888
I agree that it is an interesting company (RT) but I still don't see a convincing link with Facebook. It's possible that something is going on on a secret level, but there is no public information showing that they are involved with FB at this time. And even if they were in the past, they were never in the top 10 of shareholders unlike Peter Thiel, Bono, and others.
I would say no. Based on these links.
http:// www.
auricmedia.net/european-royals-killing-naked-children-for-fun-at-human-hunting-parties/
http:// www.
digitaljournal.com/news/politics/op-ed-judy-byington-kevin-annett-and-pope-francis-the-rapist/article/423935
http://
itccs.org/category/the-international-common-law-court-of-justice/
Everything they're claiming about the royals may well be true, but this court that has judged them guilty is hoping to gain some sort of enforcement based upon the concept of common law, so it's highly unlikely that their verdicts are going to have any legal standing to enforce.
https:// truepundit.com/narrative-fail-cbs-drops-bomb-on-trump-cambridge-analytica-claims/
Narrative Fail: CBS Drops Bomb On Trump-Cambridge Analytica Claims
Wikileaks Bombshell: Podesta Emails Prove Facebook Colluded With Hillary Clinton During Election
https:// truepundit.com/wikileaks-bombshell-podesta-emails-prove-facebook-colluded-with-hillary-clinton-during-election/
RIGGED: Stormy Danielsโ Lawyer Was on Payroll of Joe Biden, Rahm Emanuel; Previously Sued Trump & โThe Apprenticeโ Reality Show
https:// truepundit.com/rigged-stormy-daniels-lawyer-was-on-payroll-of-joe-biden-rahm-emanuel-previously-sued-trump-the-apprentice-reality-show/
No, I've never heard of the social media industry. Did you seriously just ask me that question?
My point is, if Rizvi is not a major player with FB, why would they be at the meeting with MZ and all the others?
No question that MZ is heading for stormy seas. Just don't know about the RT identification because I can't find anything definitive identifying Rizvi as having any major investments/influence with FB.
If not immunity, perhaps he was offered protection so that he wouldn't be 187'd like so many others have been.
I don't believe it is true but I still worship God. FE is not an essential doctrine. But it seems to be an obsessive doctrine for you. I believe that understanding the vast intricacy of a creation that is billions of years old has done more to make me acknowledge the greatness of God than trying to make all science fit into the box of FE, same way as the young-earth creationists do.
I think you've been deluded by fake science and Bible teachers that have portrayed FE as the only way to interpret the Bible. But if it is, as you say, a conspiracy, we'll find out in time. But for now, let's deal with the smaller conspiracies. Like the cabal and the pedos.
A simplistic interpretation of the Bible without taking the original languages or the analogical thought process of the people at the time that it was written might think that the Bible supports FE.
But there are many other sincere believers in the Bible that believe that it does NOT support FE. This is not a fundamental issue to the Christian faith.
Real science does NOT support FE. People who promote FE and YE bring disrepute upon the Bible because they teach bad science and try to link it to God.
Do you believe that all the problems of the world would be solved if people just accepted the reality of FE?
That it would if it were true. But 8chan isn't going to force the world to change their perception. Maybe you should aim for writing a book and getting a publisher.
Yeah, but if you want to enlist a force to support you, I suggest finding a FE forum where you have a lot of like-minded people and then see what you can accomplish as a group.
Or alternatively, look into reasons.org.
I'm leaning toward Rex Tillerson and not real time or Rizvi Traverse. Rizvi doesn't seem to be that closely connected to FB.
Q has used RT in more than one sense, but Tillerson makes the most sense to me.
He's been undermining Trump for a long time from when he called Trump a moron and maybe even before then.
So it wouldn't surprise me if he got angry over being fired and decided to attend a meeting to plot a little adverse strategy.