I am
not JFK jr,
I am not Q
I am not Anjel G
why are you telling me something that you could not know about from just one post about an anon?
I made a short post, that didn't give you any information about me.
the beauty of me not being any of them, and them not being each other, is that all four of us could have a conference and talk about real things and 'bring it' in communion.
that would be awesome, a service and we'd all be there loving life and being posative.
if we are all the same person such events would be rather short staffed.
you need many voices to do choral singing.
if we are all one person, we won't have that great a chorus.
um, there are people who like to fuck with anons who think that everything is compped so they pretend to be shills and post stuff that any seasoned anon just ignores to see who will react to it?
they like to do the rouse of being compped to see if anyone notices or cares?
they are playing you and know what triggers you so they post that because they know it will bug you, you are new and they are testing you?
Or it could be what you imagine and, guess what, it doesn't matter.
I wrote a long piece once about why, but it's rather insulting to the bakers. Once again: bakers are bakers. If you don't like the politics of the guy at the Diner, who slops eggs and toast, do you not use the Diner? Do you not eat his cooking?
If you upset the cook, and he's not being his best, you might not want it then.
Get over it, the bakers like to tweak us.
he's got an odd language? Maybe if he only langagued in prime numbers . . .
kek points of humiliating laughter for
using 'language' as a verb to brow beat someone about their shitpost
or they won't give attention whores attention and ignore it, being fully aware of it.
using 'language' as a verb is fine, and I point it out that the anon did that. But the browbeating of another anon for the manner of the post, and using that curious use of 'language' is what I point out.
the other anon's posts were fine, and of the same 'chan' quality as the one who was telling the other that his posts were not good enough.
my point: look at your own posts, they are just as 'chan'.
you make fun of her for wanting all that but fail to see what it represents: the idea of having family and loved ones gathered at a meal.
that is what you are making fun of by making fun of what you see as 'materialism'.
It is hard to overcome the urge to horde 'nice things'. people who had to take a lot less because of the piggishness of the elites tend to horde. Give them some love. she looks like a good person. She needs your love not your redicule.
maybe you could have a banquet and use all of those plates and glasses?
But does his new chair hover?
and does it have a bounce house around it to protect him?
and will it connect to other hovering bounce houses to make a play-house in the sky, totally safe?
this is what Fred could be designing, but instead he makes fonts so people can phony up old documents . . . (is that really what they use them for, you don't know)
obviously a false idea because network architecture allows one to code without knowledge of what the network is.
it's like saying that the heat must be from gas, but not from electricity, when the results would be the same for either way of heating an oven for a recipee, for example, for a cake.
the idea that one must have a particular type of network is incorrect in all software models.
It is like saying yuo can only write on a piece of paper with one type of pen.
if what you say were true, it would imposed by people who don't understand software.
and it hampers the student from learning the real way that networking functions for flawless transmission and reception of data.
Fred in his new sub-orbital bounce house.
wait, that's an alternative time line in which Fred didn't turn into someone who rages against those who really do feel quite fondly for him.
He's the only guy whose name is put into every bread, and that's OK.
Fred, come back.
come back from the dark side . . .
you could invent intergallatic bounce houses for floating bubble-chair free-energy collection units that double as public housing.
in the alternative time line, the one where Fred didn't go dark in his behaviors, his new wheel chair is the worlds largest bouncing ball! Sopmeone brought him to Yosemite Valley and he's bouncing around between the cliffs right now, in the meta of that alternative time line.
if only we had the genius Fred back and not dark fred the font-making chan-troll.
come back. come back. oh please come back Fred
maybe it was Bing?
OK: I'll give you what I read here:
the traincars are locked, and Mr. Trump is loaded on the train.
the cars need to be locked before the train can roll together as one unit for a common destination.
I don't have a santa hat for these three elves . . .
gang-staulking gate-keeper troll, with nothing real but bullying, implies something false.
they have hundreds of different ones. you can't possibly watch all of them. People in Hollywood need work to tide them over until the abomination cult is vanquished. Transgender people need jobs too. Just don't watch the ones you don't like. At the end of the movie they all go to heaven, right? So it's all good. They are teaching a message of sharing and redemption, right?
why don't you write a script for them, send it over to them, and see if they'll buy it from you?
Christmas at 8ch, how a young man, employeed as an elf at a local place,, for the holidays, invented a bubble house and floated off to the stars . . .
and everything will happen in a three day period like all those movies do.
they fall in love and are married by new years.
yes it is rediculous.
but they have so many of them. If you don't like one, watch a different one.
you don't watch a movie and say it sucks?
wow.
you need to at least watch some of them to give a good critique of the genre. If you've never watched one then please stop and realize that it's often fun and it's often funny, and people like the ones who are in the movie, and there isn't anything awful about a good movie. Why we are in one here, aren't we.
There are good ones from that genre, and some that seem rediculous.
you never read Dickens either?
as much as the man in the meme annoys me, I think that defining his condition as if it's a medical one really fails to adress that it is a moral one.
the man lacks something that 'normal' people have.
So it's not really a disease. and the fault is only his own that he is like that.
Many can have a callus and jaded persona, and form the devious thoughts and never ever act on any of it, but treat it as a meta-voice, that 'skeptically snarky-cat conjectorial' capacity that most adults never allow to speak out loud, and would never do any of it, but it tugs at them with humor.
schiff is someone who doesn't just hear the evil conjecture, he follows through with it. He goes along with it. He behaves with the motivations of 'worst urges'.
He knows what the right thing to do is, but he knowingly does the other thing.
he tries to gaslight the voice of morality, that he must also have, in order to fulfill whatever selfish and narcisscisstic hypnotic idea drives him forward.
if you try and gaslight your inner moral voice, what hope do you have?
He could 'do the right thing'. He knows what it is. He chooses not to. and it harms others. and that is why you call him a Sociopath.
but that is not a real medical condition, it's a term we use for someone who is a moral failure.