>>7534509

I see look from . . . . who gives it to . . . . who sits next to him on the committee.

I don't fill in the names.

they are both men.

the one who gets the look says the other needs an intervention about other issues.

>>7534542

the committee chair would love to be leaned over the chair by the guy who sits beside him and says that the comittee chair needs an interventin about being morally void and without shame.

It's easy to see.

I guess you have to appreciate men and understand how they sometimes lust after coworkers.

even when they are supposedly straight and married and wtih a son who wears curious tee shirts.

do I need to say more?

PS: I might be wrong.

>>7534586

build your closets elsewhere.

some people do not pander to stereotypes.

real mavericks don't hide behind gender fallacies.

i was correct about Arron Hernandez the first time I heard the details about what happened.

>>7534660

you can either open your ears and hear what smart people tell you, or attack them for daring to speak when you want to control the conversation.

clearly you are the kind who looks for something about an anon to attack and then goes on the offensive.

My input about that subject is valuable.

you can pretend to be an expert and ignore what I 'see' and say 'this is likely'.

how could a guy who's got a wife be a 'gay'?

that would make him a bi or closet case.

whatever, ignore the impressions I share.

that's fine.

but you do show your self as a rather persistent bully.

have you always been a bully?

>>7534734

ha you are funny.

I owe you nothing.

if you see the pictures of the interaction and the way that one looks at the other, and the look of 'go away' that the other has, you don't see the dynamic of the creepy coworker who lusts after the guy he sits next to? and the guy who he sits next to be ing like 'i don't care about your deal but I'm not interested?

and me just pointing out what it seems like, and syaing 'but how can I be sure but it looks like that' is me calling a 'bunch of people' 'gay'?

I'm so far ahead of you in being enlightened by the falsity of narratives that people like you concoct that I will say once again: ha ha.

>>7534801

what would you be doing today if you weren't shilling here?

go do that instead.

you love to tell others what their words mean, and miss the point.

you know nothing of me, what I have been through, or why I know so much about these issues.

you sure want to build a box around me. First you put in a closet now you put me in a tomb (a public university living as a liberal).

you are clueless and desparate.

I respect and love people. I think that people are much better when they can share their affections for each other. but I understand how weak people like . . . . often are too lusty for their own good. And very attractive men are prayed upon by the lustful, even when they are good natured and cheery and married.

Do I express hatred for etier the luster or the lustee? no. I describe it.

you express

1. being gay is 'bad'

2. being lustful is 'bad'

3. someone who can sense that is 'bad' for saying it. (mostly true , but not in an anonymous foreum).

whatever, you are clueless.

you love to build boxes and then force people into them.

if you knew my story you'd probably feel a little shame for being such a jerk.

but I don't look for pity.

sad you are so much of a type casting idiot.

imagine that, people who don't fit into your stupid categories and will not cow to your gaslighting and truth-shaming.

>>7534911

now I'm supposed to leave becase I've vanquished you?

you still haven't answered as to why you are a bully.

>>7534911

It's funny in some sense watching out your posts have devolved into frenzied attempts to smear and shame me.

for what end?

I wish you no ill will but telling someone with observations to leave a free speech board, and implying that everything I do and say is wrong . . . is YOU not me.

I'm stepping out for a while you won't get any more responses from me.

but one more point: do you always make up stuff about people and then accuse them of it?

cause that is what you do.

that is why I say you 'build a box' and demand that others get in it.

I'm past the point of thinking that you have any sense of shame for your behavior here.

your point of view is this: find someone who I think has a weak position, and then pummel them inot capitulation.

I don't care. You don't know me.

you are a bully.

you need to work on that.

>>7535047

even if all the bullshit you say about me, gaslighting the issue to try and make me feel shame were true, your behavior is still that of a bully.

get help.

>>7535146

and you prove it once again,e ven though Q is posting you can't resist displaying your chest thumping.

time for you to do as you say and stop doing as you do.

you realize you do need to contain this unless you really are 'just a shill', but not YOUU.

now hush so people can respond to Q!

(Or don't)

>>7535151

Or someone who made an observation and a persistent discouragement shill attacking him constantly for saying 'no don't pigeon hole me'.

the other one devolved into name calling and chest thumping.

Oh, well, people don't like an unfiltered view of things, I guess.

>>7535042

the bread is almost done, Q is posting, it will all be over soon enough this bread.