Was thinking the exact same, yesterday!
It's a logical fallacy to assume marker [9] refers to one specific person. It could be an indictment with multiple defendants. It could be a particular incident having many people associated with it. It could be one statute broken from a list. We still don't know what Q's marker system is or how it works. STILL.
Sorry, anon doesn't do actors or movies or TV. Enjoy your programming but this anon usually keeps clear of it.