Anonymous ID: 195ab8 Dec. 17, 2019, 9:21 p.m. No.7543000   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3022 >>3048

>>7542938

  1. Hide from FOIA searches.

  2. It may have previously been on a paper document that was scanned and OCRed. (less likely, since other 'm's weren't converted to 'rn's.)

  3. A deliberate reference to Comey's standing-in-corn-fields Twitter pictures. It's also possible that during Comey's career he was fond of farming analogies to describe the progression of investigations and Q & Co are needling him with this.

 

There is no clear consensus yet.

Anonymous ID: 195ab8 Dec. 17, 2019, 9:55 p.m. No.7543240   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3298

>>7543212

"People are saying they're seeing UFOs. Do I believe it? Not particularly," he added.

 

The evidence hes was shown must not have been very compelling (so no mangled UFO or bodies at Area 51).

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/15/trump-briefed-ufos-but-doesnt-particularly-believe-them/1465077001/

Anonymous ID: 195ab8 Dec. 17, 2019, 10:18 p.m. No.7543349   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3356

>>7543314

SGT Report, Dec 2017:

https://www.sgtreport.com/2017/12/2017-12-30-wishful-thinking-or-trump-deep-state-counter-coup-reality-delta-force-raids-obama-stronghold-in-thailand/

 

Original source ("Someone's Bones", never heard of them) is no longer available. DuckDuckGo's cache suggest they're a"Nibiru PlanetX" site.

 

Nah.

Anonymous ID: 195ab8 Dec. 17, 2019, 10:36 p.m. No.7543406   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3438

>>7543376

>Man, is gold and silver ever going to take over

I'm not betting on any dramatic change to the monetary system while this POTUS is around. And his successors will likely be of a similar mind.

I've always interpreted Q's post about gold destroying the Fed to be about a scandal involving them lending out gold to profit off the interest when they were supposed to be keeping it safe in their vaults.

Anonymous ID: 195ab8 Dec. 17, 2019, 11:02 p.m. No.7543509   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3520

>>7543412

Informatively, was doesn't always answer the question that was asked. Look at how he answered "Did NASA fake the moon landings?". It was a simple yes/no question. But instead to addressing it he responded to the conspiracy theory, which he called "False". So was that "No" in response to the "Are we alone?" question or to the final question "Roswell?" "Consider the vastness of space." could just as well imply that transversing such great distances is impossible and that therefore Roswell could not have been what it was claimed.

 

People interpret it how they want.