[i] = [9]
Posts all in December (I've been thinking the "clock" is week or month based, with marker confirmations sometimes being a few days apart)
This all seemed relevant, just sharing.
In my opinion, many [markers] have propaganda or narrative importance, but others just serve to reinforce the methods to us, and the fact that they are in control. It may have some meaning, or it could just be a wink and that's all.
I think there is something fundamental about the timing of the drops and they way they relate to each other, so when I find something like this I share it even if I'm not quite sure what it's greater relevance is.
Not as useless as your comment.
Getting close to what exactly?
You seem kinda mid-witted, does a picture with a handful of numbers on it confuse you?
No harm done anon
I wouldn't include the Falcon 9 as relevant solely on the merit of it being "9"
Only reason it's included is the original [i] post by Q was referencing a SpaceX Falcon 9 launch.
The fact that there was another launch within a day of Q mentioning [9] seemed like it was a relevant news match.
Lately I am trying to understand the cyclic inter-year nature of the drops, and related things like this happening in the same week/month but with a 1-2 year delta seem to be a recurring theme.
I dunno anon, I get that it's fun and everything to imagine they are on our side, but Hannity still aggressively deepthroats GWB any chance he gets.
He's a useful fucking idiot for the time being, but this particular brand of liar are the most dangerous, and who landed us here in the first place.
They act as the "right side" frame of the overton window, giving the illusion of discourse while carefully protecting any truth that might actually wake anyone up.
She's not, that's just what it looks like when you stretch skin back across a skeletal face one too many times.
God this bitch's face is aggressively ugly.