dChan
` ID: 634756 Dec. 18, 2019, 6:03 p.m. No.7553779   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4036

The Fabian Society, the Third Way and modern British thought

 

https://churchmousec.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/the-fabian-society-the-third-way-and-modern-british-thought/

 

Pray Devoutly, Hammer Stoutly

Do we know someone who is appropriating this hammer imagery? Part of The Plan.

 

The Fabians were elitists. They had scant regard for servants, factory workers or the poor. Their plan was to control these people through societal measures and programmes, such as eugenics. The goal, as in General Fabius’s strategy, was to break people down bit by bit and engineer their behaviour without them being conscious of it. They called this societal plan the Third Way. If that sounds familiar, it is because former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair used it in the 1990s. People found this term quite novel, but it was simply Fabianism.

 

Others have documented how the Fabians in Canada, were instrumental in creating the USA's Deep State.

 

http://canadianpatriot.org/origins-of-deep-state-part1/

 

http://canadianpatriot.org/origins-of-deep-state-part2/

 

http://canadianpatriot.org/what-is-the-fabian-society-and-to-what-end-was-it-created/

` ID: 634756 Dec. 18, 2019, 6:14 p.m. No.7553963   🗄️.is đź”—kun

The Structure of Heresthetical Power

 

This paper considers manipulation of collective choice – in such environments, a potential alternative is powerful only to the degree that its introduction can affect the collective decision. Using the Banks set (Banks [1985]), we present and characterize alternatives that can, and those that can not, affect sophisticated collective decision making. Along with offering two substantive findings about political manipulation and a link between our results and Riker’s concept of heresthetic, we define a new tournament solution concept that refines the Banks set, which we refer to as the heresthetically stable set.

 

''William Riker defined heresthetic as the art of political strategy. In The Art of Political Manipulation, he describes three aspects of heresthetic: (1) agenda control, (2) strategic voting, and (3) manipulations of dimensions. 1 The first two of these aspects – particularly strategic/sophisticated voting are well understood – in particular, the results of Farquharson [1969], McKelvey and Niemi [1978], Shepsle and Weingast [1984], and Banks [1985] (among others) have provided us with an impressive level of understanding about the

strategic incentives of both voters and agenda-setters in situations in which the set of alternatives to be voted upon is predetermined.''

 

Does it sound like these people want you to decide for yourself?

 

This type of political manipulation was used in all the treaties that created the European Union, and enlarged it by adding countries. The Paris Agreement on climate was reached as a result of heavy manipulation behind the scenes. The United Nations….

 

Your whole world is one big scam created by ConArtists

 

Read the entire paper, 35 pages, attached. And use the keyword heresthetics to find out what other fuckery they are up to.