ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

ERIC CIARAMELLA

>ERIC CIARAMELLA

>>7553683

>posted in 2017

>had majority in both house and senate

<Democrats unveil two articles of impeachment against Trump

<abuse of power

<obstruction of Congress

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/10/politics/impeachment-articles-announced/index.html

<abuse of power

>Here’s the big question on which the potential impeachment of President Donald Trump could turn: Is it ever appropriate for a U.S. president to ask a foreign government to investigate a political rival?

>Republicans, meanwhile, contend that it is perfectly normal, and justified, for Trump as president to ask the Ukrainians to look into potential corruption that involves Americans and could, in theory, affect U.S. relations with that country.

>History shows that a president sometimes might be justified in asking a foreign country to investigate a political rival, including a former vice president. So, the mere fact of Trump’s request for an investigation into the Bidens, without considering the circumstances of the request, is not enough to impeach him.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/10/06/trump-ukraine-investigate-rival-229341

<obstruction of Congress

>Professor Jonathan Turley criticized Congress for implying that President Trump was obstructing justice by going to the Supreme Court for rulings about impeachment.

>He added, “If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power — it’s your abuse of power. You’re doing precisely what you’re criticizing the president for doing.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/its-your-abuse-of-power-impeachment-witness-rips-congress-for-obstruction-of-justice-claim

They made shit up and impeached him out of desperation.

libshits have turned impeachment, which used to be a serious charge of wrongdoing against a president, into an official notice of a virtue signal

>>7553768

No it doesn't you fucking idiot.

You are "impeached" SOLEY because of a house vote.

You're REMOVED if the senate convicts.

>>7553804

>he hasn't heard

There's not going to be a trial with witnesses.

>>7553830

Dude are you not a US citizen or something?

IT'S TIME ANONS

MEME WAR 2020 HAS BEEN DECLARED

VOTE FOR IMPEACHMENT, GET VOTED OUT

>Rep. Tom O’Halleran (AZ-01)

>Rep. Lucy McBath (GA-06)

>Rep. Lauren Underwood (IL-14)

>Rep. Cheri Bustos (IL-17)

>Rep. Abby Finkenauer (IA-07)

>Rep. Dave Loebsack (IA-02)

>Rep. Cindy Axne (IA-03)

>Rep. Jared Golden (ME-02)

>Rep. Elissa Slotkin (MI-08)

>Rep. Haley Stevens (MI-11)

>Rep. Angie Craig (MN-02)

>~~Rep. Collin Peterson (MN-07)~~

>Rep. Susie Lee (NV-03)

>Rep. Chris Pappas (NH-01)

>~~Rep. Jefferson Van Drew (NJ-02)~~

>Rep. Andy Kim (NJ-03)

>Rep. Josh Gottheimer (NJ-05)

>Rep. Mikie Sherrill (NJ-11)

>Rep. Xochitl Torres Small (NM-02)

>Rep. Max Rose (NY-11)

>Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (NY-18)

>Rep. Antonio Delgado (NY-19)

>Rep. Anthony Brindisi (NY-22)

>Rep. Kendra Horn (OK-05)

>Rep. Matt Cartwright (PA-08)

>Rep. Conor Lamb (PA-17)

>Rep. Joe Cunningham (SC-01)

>Rep. Ben McAdams (UT-04)

>Rep. Elaine Luria (VA-02)

>Rep. Abigail Spanberger (VA-07)

>Rep. Ron Kind (WI-03)

VOTE FOR IMPEACHMENT, GET VOTED OUT

>>7553979

Working on some nice pasta to post

>>7553968

nah, she's not

she's based on like 3 policies and a qt, but a libtard nonetheless

>>7554139

Honestly, I think it might be McCabe.

>>7554141

Dude.

You're impeached if the house passes the bill.

It's semantics, but Trump was just impeached.

He won't be removed (convicted).

>>7554171

I agree.

>>7554201

In 2017.