Anonymous ID: 3971a7 Dec. 18, 2019, 7:35 p.m. No.7555151   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Any lawfags around? POTUS made a comment during the rally that stood out. Said he didn’t think D’s would be so stupid to impeach after he announced he was running again. Paraphrasing there. Is there a precedence case out there that would apply?

Anonymous ID: 3971a7 Dec. 18, 2019, 7:45 p.m. No.7555343   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7555229

The preferable next step would be for the Senate to ask the Supreme Court to determine whether the four grounds cited by the Constitution for removal of a president are exclusive, and accordingly this impeachment bill need not be tried, or those categories are merely illustrative, and Gerald Ford was correct when he said impeachment can be for any reason the majority in the House of Representatives determines.

Anonymous ID: 3971a7 Dec. 18, 2019, 7:54 p.m. No.7555502   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Take the lower chamber’s articles of impeachment to the SC to see if they even meet the Constitutional litmus test of being valid. They throw it out for not, and POTUS has not been impeached. I like the Plan.

Anonymous ID: 3971a7 Dec. 18, 2019, 7:59 p.m. No.7555652   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7555582

Do you want this shit done right? Over a hundred years of fuckery has been going on and you’re going to be an impatient bitch. You are either a shill or don’t fucking belong here.