Anons, walk with me

-Nancy Pelosi leads vote to Impeach DJT

-All but 3 democrats vote Yay

-Nancy says she might not send articles to the Senate because she doesn’t know what the rules will be

-INSERT RUDY

-Mountain of corroborated evidence that exposes Biden’s and Obama Administration to money laundering, embezzlement, etc.

-Treaty with Ukraine on corruption

-Trump withholding aid justified

-Nancy pulls back (or does nothing with) articles of impeachment

-Nancy seen as fair and reasonable

-Nancy saved from prosecution for playing her part

-Democrats previously on record saying “nobody is above the law” JAMMED

-Biden/Obama/others impeached

-Trump exonerated absolutely

Could this be possible?

>>7555136

Please read

>>7555192

I agree, but what if she knowingly sinks the democrat party [forces their hand to prosecute swamp]. Personally, I would give NP a pass if she was in on all of this and destroyed the democrats.

To my knowledge she is not part of the trafficking fuckery. Republicans would see her as reasonable if she THREW OUT the articles after seeing Rudy’s evidence, no?

All I know is it’s VERY, and I mean TIPPY TOP fucking spoopy of her to not send articles to the Senate. And if I know the swamp, they are thinking the EXACT SAME THING right now.

Something is very suspect about all of this.

>>7555232

>>7555283

>>7555287

I get it. I do.

But if she sank the democrat party with a slight of hand, wouldn’t that earn her SOMETHING?

>>7555389

All democrats have gone on record saying Trump should be impeached.

But there’s a special place for Schiff since he will be exposed for driving the titanic into the iceberg, no?

>>7555466

>>7555136

Please confirm