Anonymous ID: 67b266 Dec. 18, 2019, 9:17 p.m. No.7556672   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6711 >>6748

>>7556639

this tbh

feels like the axe has been poised to fall for years, the next big thing is always "just around the corner"

except nothing's really happening

meanwhile "Q" merch seems to be selling like hotcakes

Anonymous ID: 67b266 Dec. 18, 2019, 9:22 p.m. No.7556702   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6711 >>6721 >>6748 >>6844

can anyone riddle me this?

whatever happened with the Q post that "subtley" showed a reflection of the interior of Air Force One that was proven to be a complete photoshop

I remember a lot of people dropping out of the movement then, but what do modern Q lurkers think? or are you even aware of aforementioned post

Anonymous ID: 67b266 Dec. 18, 2019, 9:30 p.m. No.7556758   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6766 >>6804 >>6805 >>6952 >>6968

>>7556711

thanks for answering my question fucktard

either you don't know what I'm specifically referring to or your an automaton

/pol/ was mostly behind Q up until that post came out, at which point Q posts more or less became relegated to the containment board

I'm genuinely curious, because none of the shit I've personally seen come from Q, including the "proofs" has seemed substantial enough to justify anything

I'd be glad to know if there's information I'm not yet privy to, I'm open to the possibilities

Anonymous ID: 67b266 Dec. 18, 2019, 9:35 p.m. No.7556804   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6813 >>6875

>>7556721

literally did, somewhere in 2017 timeframe

Q post was a picture which showed a reflection off a watch, or some such shit, with an inverted reflection

it was being touted as another "proof" until intrepid autists noticed some inconsistencies in the image

 

>>7556748

still not answering

 

>>7556758

that was my bad, with the multiple interpretations of my phrasing

>/pol/ was mostly behind Q

I meant "behind" as in "supportive", not literally

Anonymous ID: 67b266 Dec. 18, 2019, 9:43 p.m. No.7556875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6891 >>6944

>>7556766

my b, replied to my own post

>>7556804

 

>>7556805

fucking try me you lazy piece of shit

it's easier to call me a shill than to treat my post as coming from a place of authenticity

really not inspiring a sense of credibility here

 

>>7556813

prove it, show me the evidence

not that it would matter even if you could because it means literally nothing in the context of what I'm asking about

 

I'm trying to have an open mind here but you guys are making it awfully difficult

 

>>7556844

thank you, finally someone who knows what I'm talking about

and what are the facts exactly, as you see them

curious to know how that influences your willingness to overlook that whole debacle

Anonymous ID: 67b266 Dec. 18, 2019, 9:49 p.m. No.7556938   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6955

>>7556891

>cites reddit users as evidence of Q's opinion of /pol/

look nigger, write me off as a shill and filter my posts so I don't have to see any more of your retarded shit lmao

Anonymous ID: 67b266 Dec. 18, 2019, 10:03 p.m. No.7557067   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7090

>>7556944

I feel that my dude

I just basically asked you to do a lot of work on my behalf for no good reason

>Even if did doesn't mean the message was for us

never thought of that tbh

guess I'm looking for that one "ah-hah!" thing that Q has done that will convince me, just hadn't found it in my previous digging a couple years back

didn't know if there was anything that fit the criteria

 

>>7556955

yeah, I'm kinda retarded ngl

kudos where kudos are due, I misread your post in my rapid fire replying

my bad

 

>>7556968

>How do you rate half/pol quality the last 2 weeks?

I don't touch halfchan, I've been without an imageboard since 8ch was kill

I'm not really sure what your point was tbh, I'm just as happy as you to have an internet home again, no complaints

first reply above is basically why I posted in the first place

I've just been lurking these past 2 days and I've seen some shit that's like "how the fuck is a regular ass F-16 flight pattern considered 'noteworthy'"

makes me wonder if this place is just some weird "I want to believe" deluded conspiracy theory echo chamber

Anonymous ID: 67b266 Dec. 18, 2019, 10:10 p.m. No.7557170   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7193

>>7557090

kinda confused, are you meaning to imply that someone may have "created" said image in order to discredit the original Q post?

from what I seem to remember, people had found the original image and it was from the Obama era

I appreciate your patience

 

>>7557107

this is what I was talking about

could you please explain why anyone should give a fuck about the movement of planes

 

>>7557137

I hope you're legit Q, because if not this country is completely fucked

Anonymous ID: 67b266 Dec. 18, 2019, 10:18 p.m. No.7557284   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7327

>>7557193

ah, I see what you mean

if that's the case, it'd be nice see the discreditors images and see if they truly match Q's original post or if there was some actual shady shit going on

alas, is not to be

 

at the very least you've managed to plant enough doubt in my mind that I'm willing to be more observant with this stuff

thanks for the feedback