Anonymous ID: f430af Dec. 18, 2019, 10:33 p.m. No.7557484   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7540 >>7552 >>7553

>>7557331 Q LB

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Track_II_diplomacy

 

>Track II diplomacy or "backchannel diplomacy" is the practice of "non-governmental, informal and unofficial contacts and activities between private citizens or groups of individuals, sometimes called 'non-state actors'". It contrasts with track I diplomacy, which is official, governmental diplomacy that occur inside official government channels.

 

>History

>Track Two diplomacy referred to conflict resolution efforts by professional non-governmental conflict resolution practitioners and theorists. "Track Two has as its object the reduction or resolution of conflict, within a country or between countries, by lowering the anger or tension or fear that exists, through improved communication and a better understanding of each other's point of view".

[…]

>Track two diplomacy is unofficial, non-structured interaction. It is always open minded, often altruistic, and … strategically optimistic, based on best case analysis. Its underlying assumption is that actual or potential conflict can be resolved or eased by appealing to common human capabilities to respond to good will and reasonableness. Scientific and cultural exchanges are examples of track two diplomacy. The problem most political liberals fail to recognize is that reasonable and altruistic interaction with foreign countries cannot be an alternative to traditional track one diplomacy, with its official posturing and its underlying threat of the use of force. Both tracks are necessary for psychological reasons and both need each other.

 

…………………….

 

So who are in the back channel?

I was going to say Q and anons because we are not part of government, but I don't think we fit the description of being the good cop to POTUS's bad cop. I saw us more as Flynn's army of digital soldiers.

Although Q has suggested in the past that we also have a role of gently red-pilling those close to us.