Those losers still trying to keep up?
Vow and Oath
At the heart of Anglo-Saxon law from the 4th Century is the concept that “a mans’ oath is his bond” – in other words once a promise is given, it is expected to be kept. This of course is most often presented in terms of contracts. However, the foundation of law since these times and up to the present day is still based on oral testimony taking precedence over written documents (in memoriam). What is an oath then? In accordance with Canon 1480 of Positive Law: “an oath is is a solemn appeal to the Divine Creator by invocation and the presence of at least two witnesses that a pronouncement is true or a promise binding”. What is the difference between an oath and a vow? In accordance with Canon 1488 of Positive Law: “A Vow is a solemn engagement or undertaking made to the Divine Creator to perform some action, to make some gift or sacrifice in return for special favour”.
Now the difference then between Anglo-Saxon law and Roman (Western) Law formed by the elite anti-semitic Venetian/Florentine Khazar Bankers/Slave traders is the dependence on vows and oaths being true, in order that they can be monetized and bonded.
In other words, the law of the Roman Cult and the Bar Associations/Society depends on the foundation of Anglo-Saxon law as demonstrated through Positive Law to function. It is a symbiotic relationship between the “host”, the living man or woman, functioning under ancient moral values and the "parasitic" court and banks then seizing that good will and energy to monetize it for their own benefit. This is also why consent is so vital. Without consent, this energy cannot be stolen and monetized.