all links are (pb)

>>7559673

>>7559720

The maxim "lurk more" is not just culture, it's an imperative. Why?

-You're walking into someone else's house, you have no idea how they operate

-You have to lurk to understand many of the concepts discussed

-Most oldfags have a degree of background knowledge on topics discussed due to sometimes decades of independent research

-Oldfags who have been "here" (before Q appeared) have a shared experience, shared knowledge, and can recall obscure details mentioned by someone else who was also there or recalls an article, previous dig etc

-You have to watch how shilling works, the methods and techniques that are used and how they are avoided, countered and shut down. This includes the whores who come here to post their tits and do nothing but distract, as well as the "anons" who "defend" them.

-Learn how to participate in a way that is not superfluous; this is not a goddamn chat room, we don't need to know when you're going to bed or anything about your personal life

When you come here you are jumping into a very deep part of the ocean. It's not that you can't swim or everyone doesn't believe you can swim, but until you lurk for a long time (2 years generally) you are not properly equipped to participate in this particular venue fully. Nothing prevents you from adding research or memes you find or make, but lurking for a long time will help you to not only participate more meaningfully and contribute more, but also grow as a person and help.

Again, nothing prevents you from posting but if you show your ass you can be guaranteed you will be called out. This is the sausage grinder, a hurt-box. Contrary to what newfags (who think themselves oldfags for being 'here' since '17) believe, we are not here to make friends or be your friend, but that doesn't preclude friendliness or affection, a paradox that can only be truly understood by lurkiing a long time. There are very good reasons for the "rules" and without lurking for a long time you cannot learn them or understand why they exist, which believe it or not, are very valid and wise.

There is a SFW board for normalfags and newfags.

This is not meant to be condescending or "divisive" in any way, but merely as an explanation that will hopefully help you and others.

>>7559730

>I legit lurked for about 2 months before posting on halfchan.

>2 months

Need more lurking

>>7559753

He also said "The best is yet to come!"

>>7559991

>missing 't'

There was an i that was dotted, but a t that was not crossed?

Enjoying the show

>>7560107

>>7560153

>>7560361

Look on the spreadsheet - you can ctrl+F and find it easily. If Q linked to it, it's got direct & archive links to it

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Efm2AcuMJ7whuuB6T7ouOIwrE_9S-1vDJLAXIVPZU2g

>>7560407

TY for your service!

Amid FISA Scrutiny, Critics Warn of FBI Briefing 'Subterfuge'

By Susan Crabtree - RCP Staff

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/12/19/amid_fisa_scrutiny_critics_warn_of_fbi_briefing_subterfuge_141993.html

https://archive.is/wip/iEMsA

“We concluded that the FBI’s use of this briefing for investigative reasons could potentially interfere with the expectation of trust and good faith among participants in strategic intelligence briefings, thereby frustrating their purpose,” Horowitz’s report said.

In condemning that FBI action last week, Graham referred to a defensive FBI briefing the full Senate was set to receive and wondered aloud if it would be used to gather intelligence on senators.

“I hope that doesn’t happen to us tomorrow — I’ll be really pissed if it does,” he said when questioning the IG during a Judiciary Committee hearing last week. “When we get defensively briefed tomorrow, would it be okay for FBI agents to open up 302s [FBI interview notes] on what we said?”

Horowitz responded that his team has “very significant concerns” about such a practice. He said FBI Director Christopher Wray has promised that it will not occur again.

Wray’s vow, however, doesn’t go far enough for some longtime law enforcement officials. These critics say Horowitz’s findings are just the beginning of the overhaul needed to restore public trust in the FBI. They also are looking to U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal inquiry into the FBI’s handling of the Russia investigation for more definitive answers along with punishment for the myriad mistakes, unorthodox tactics, and evidence of political bias against Trump.

>>7560443

I see the "anon" who is convinced that everyone is a bot is back. Tierasas is his name, I think.

There is no convincing that person that you are a human being, some serious mental distortions with that one…

>>7560454

I made an archivist patch, just for kicks (got bored & playing around in PS)

>>7560478

Cautionary tale. He made seriously bad choices and is enjoying his fate.

>>7560484

I have not seen him use a name but he's consistently fucking mental. I filter him, too - I don't need to see his inane bullshit about how everyone is a bot.