Anonymous ID: 55af91 March 22, 2018, 11 a.m. No.756154   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>756137

except that first explanation is wrong, context here is not the Getty thing but the asia op.

 

also you can just point them to literally dozens of Q posts that included statements, and they'll see the segment was bullshitting them and cherrypicking a mostly vague post

Anonymous ID: 55af91 March 22, 2018, 11:20 a.m. No.756364   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6379

>>756353

i was around last night when the FE shift was off, it was all the same REEEEING but about another subject completely.

Same kind of posts on "both sides", all the while shitting up bread.

Now it's back to this topic.

So plain to see

Anonymous ID: 55af91 March 22, 2018, 11:26 a.m. No.756415   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>756398

because them feeding them are just other thems

that's the whole idea with not engaging: it makes no difference if you're a "real anon" telling them to go away as if that'll work or just playing the part

Anonymous ID: 55af91 March 22, 2018, 11:40 a.m. No.756567   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>756532

but the turn-around about him is so wild: here's this guy way, way, way, waaaay smarter than me.

Who the fcuk am i to ridicule him because i don't "agree" with what he's saying now? How about maybe he can be smart at other things than chess?