Barr interview will be a KILLER! He is the AG of We The People. Criminal or Civil, he must fight for US! If We The People are being harmed with an unconstitutional impeachment, He has to fight it. He has to arrest those who are attempting a coup. The SC might not have the power to visit the House of Representatives and their articles of impeachment, but Barr can indict and arrest those who attempted a coup. The SC can hear THAT case!

>>7565279 ( me ) At this point, there has been no "damage" ( legal definition ) to any person. The articles of impeachment are akin to filing a police report.

If it goes to the Senate and Trump is acquitted, "damages" at a minimal, would be civil " Barr would have to step in and act against those in the House.

If Trump is convicted without being allowed a proper trial and proper defense, the Senate is as guilty as the House of criminal violations.

(Sedition)

63 million people will have been harmed and Barr MUST address the actions on our behalf.

Nancy's turn to move was halted. She hasn't completed her turn yet.

Criminal liability attaches once it goes to the Senate.

I have been trying to understand the game play about why Nancy, Schiff, and Naddler are stepping in and out at key moments of these proceedings. I understand it now while listening to Barr.

A coup is not actually committed until they make the attempt to remove POTUS.

So far this could be defended as a smear attempt to prevent him from being re-elected.

(Not saying they would succeed in that defense, just saying they could put up a defense of that to fight sedition)

The real engagement comes IF Nancy sends it to the Senate.

They didn't charge him with a crime for the same reason ( an attempt at a defense )

Schiff is in for a penny, in for a pound because he met with Steel and set representation to Ukraine )

Schiff is involved from before the election and continue. Nancy and Nadler might not have a trail of involvement from BEFORE 2016 election. They have clearly joined the conspiracy from my point of view, but they have set themselves up for a defense with their bouncing in and out of proceedings.

~ lawfag jr.

>>7565279 ( me ) >>7565726 ( me )

The revelations are coming to me like a flood of epiphanies.

Nancy is known to whip votes and MSM has made it a point to say she is not whipping votes on the floor/ Nancy came out in press conferences several times to say she was not telling people how to vote and they had to vote their conscience .

Nancy is trying to walk the line to not commit acts that lock her in to sedition laws. She is not whipping so she is not crossing the line to advocating for the over throw.

POTUS used a strange phrase today and said The Dems have their "Arm on" other members to make them vote in favor of impeachment.

I didn't now what that meant at the time but I know what he meant now after seeing Barr.

It is the Long Arm Statute aka Long Arm of the Law Doctrine.

It means someone has the power to 'reach in to " another jurisdiction to enforce a law/doctrine that they are not living in.

Nancy's previous threats of not funding campaigns for any member that doesn't vote party line , is a "Long Arm" threat for impeachment votes