All the way! from ger!
trump and frogarmy
She is prettyโฆ dead.
These 3 Q posts are connected; The Grassley tweet, Trump tweet and the Q post.
ChuckGrassley
@ChuckGrassley
Why is Dem house now getting cold feet abt moving ahead w impeachment trial? They want 2hijack Senate process+muck up senate/SCOTUS schedule U need some consideration abt SCOTUS since Chief Justice presides in Senate. R they worried their articles r too weak to move fwd?
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
The Mueller Report, despite being written by Angry Democrats and Trump Haters, and with unlimited money behind it ($35,000,000), didnโt lay a glove on me. I DID NOTHING WRONG. If the partisan Dems ever tried to Impeach, I would first head to the U.S. Supreme Court. Not onlyโฆโฆ
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
17 Dec 2019 - 1:48:20 PM
The Senate must be unrestricted to conduct 'other' important business.
If [D]s knew Senate would not vote to convict - why proceed?
How long does a typical Senate impeachment trial take?
Can the Senate conduct 'other' business during this time?
No.
What 'value' might this have for [D]s?
Barr/Durham working in secret?
Senate working openly?
'Value' of public learning the truth prior to i_unseal?
Propaganda_push failing.
Transparency & Accountability is the only way forward to save the Republic.
This is not another 4-year election.
Game theory.
Q
In my opinion, what this says is the Ds only pushed impeachment so that the Senate can never call anyone into question about what they did in 2016โฆ Graham said on Hannity not long ago that RR would be called in. Horowitz was just called in. They KNOW that the DECLAS and indictments are coming, but they don't want people coming into the Senate to openly testify, whereas Barr and Durham are working in secret. That's why Trump tweeted that he would push it straight to the SCOTUS, so it would not block the Senate at all from calling witnesses in an open setting.
Filter whatever you like.
Nobody should care what you do with your own mouse. Unless of course they are pushing a message they hink you will filterโฆโฆ
โฆlike this interminable, boring, repetitive shit.
But hey read itโฆ. it's a lot like slamming your brain into first gear at 90 MPH.>>7566080
Nyt article Durham scrutinizing Brennan
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/19/us/politics/durham-john-brennan-cia.html
Filtered
>muh fonts
chay nah
sauce
PANIC IN DC!!!
/kicks rock
will i need to put on pants?
nice
we've gamed essentially every scenario imaginable so im guessing no
well no "good" scenarios at least
i can imagine a lot of bad endings that would put everyone in the hospital
This is just the beginning, they're already turning on Durham despite their past AGs including Reno and Holder appointing him for investigating things. But now all of a sudden he's a bad guy or some political tool.