Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 12:53 p.m. No.7573818   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3830 >>3831 >>3845 >>3846 >>3941 >>3956 >>4312 >>4475

Larry C. Johnson: Did John Brennan’s CIA Create Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks?

 

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report insists that Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks were created by Russia’s military intelligence organization, the GRU, as part of a Russian plot to meddle in the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election. But this is a lie.

 

Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks were created by Brennan’s CIA and this action by the CIA should be a target of U.S. Attorney John Durham’s investigation. Let me explain why.

 

Let us start with the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment aka ICA. Only three agencies of the 17 in the U.S. intelligence community contributed to and coordinated on the ICA–the FBI, the CIA and NSA. In the preamble to the ICA, you can read the following explanation about methodology:

 

When Intelligence Community analysts use words such as “we assess” or “we judge,” they are conveying an analytic assessment or judgment

 

To be clear, the phrase,“We assess”, is intel community jargon for “opinion”. If there was actual evidence or source material for a judgment the writer of the assessment would state, “According to a reliable source” or “knowledgeable source” or “documentary evidence.”

 

Pay close attention to what the analysts writing the ICA stated about the GRU and Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks:

 

We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets.

 

Guccifer 2.0, who claimed to be an independent Romanian hacker, made multiple contradictory statements and false claims about his likely Russian identity throughout the election. Press reporting suggests more than one person claiming to be Guccifer 2.0 interacted with journalists.

Content that we assess was taken from e-mail accounts targeted by the GRU in March 2016 appeared on DCLeaks.com starting in June.

 

We assess with high confidence that the GRU relayed material it acquired from the DNC and senior Democratic officials to WikiLeaks. Moscow most likely chose WikiLeaks because of its self-proclaimed reputation for authenticity. Disclosures through WikiLeaks did not contain any evident forgeries.

 

Not one piece of corroborating intelligence. It is all based on opinion and strong belief. There was no human source report or electronic intercept pointing to a relationship between the GRU and the two alleged creations of the GRU–Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com.

 

Now consider the spin that Robert Mueller put on this opinion in his report on possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. Mueller bluffs the unsuspecting reader into believing that it is a proven fact that Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks were Russian assets. But he is relying on a mere opinion from a handpicked group of intel analysts working under the direction of then CIA Director John Brennan.

 

Here’s Mueller’s take (I apologize for the lengthy quote but it is important that you read how the Mueller team presents this):

 

DCLeaks

 

“The GRU began planning the releases at least as early as April 19, 2016, when Unit 26165 registered the domain dcleaks.com through a service that anonymized the registrant.137 Unit 26165 paid for the registration using a pool of bitcoin that it had mined.138 The dcleaks.com landing page pointed to different tranches of stolen documents, arranged by victim or subject matter. Other dcleaks.com pages contained indexes of the stolen emails that were being released (bearing the sender, recipient, and date of the email). To control access and the timing of releases, pages were sometimes password-protected for a period of time and later made unrestricted to the public.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/larry-c-johnson-did-john-brennans-cia-create-guccifer-2-0-and-dcleaks/

 

1/2

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 12:55 p.m. No.7573831   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7573818

 

Contacted various media outlets through this set up and claimed credit for hacking the DNC, sharing copies of files purportedly from the hack (one of which had Russian error messages embedded in them) with reporters from Gawker, The Smoking Gun and other outlets.

Carried out searches for terms that were mostly in English, several of which would appear in Guccifer 2.0’s first blog post. They chose to do this via a server based in Moscow. (this is from the indictment,

“On or about June 15, 2016, the Conspirators logged into a Moscow-based server used and managed by Unit 74455”)

Created a blog and made an initial blog post claiming to have hacked the DNC, providing links to various documents as proof.

Carelessly dropped a “Russian Smiley” into his first blog post.

Managed to add the name “Феликс Эдмундович” (which translates to Felix Dzerzhinsky, also known as “Iron Felix”) to the metadata of several documents. (Several sources went beyond what the evidence shows and made claims about Guccifer 2.0 using a Russian keyboard, however, these claims are just assumptions made in response to the presence of cyrillic characters.)

 

The only thing that the Guccifer 2.0 character did not do to declare its Russian heritage was to take out full page ads in the New York Times and Washington Post. But the “forensic” fingerprints that Guccifer 2.0 was leaving behind is not the only inexplicable event.

 

Time for the common sense standard again. Crowdstrike detected the Russians on the 6th of May, according to CEO Dimitri Alperovitch, but took no steps to shutdown the network, eliminate the malware and clean the computers until 34 days later, i.e., the 10th of June. That is 34 days of inexcusable inaction.

 

It is only AFTER Julian Assange announces on 12 June 2016 that WikiLeaks has emails relating to Hillary Clinton that DCLeaks or Guccifer 2.0 try to contact Assange.

 

The actions attributed to DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0 should be priority investigative targets for U.S. Attorney John Durham’s team of investigators. . It needs to be done. The only intelligence agency that evidence indicates was meddling via cyber attacks in the 2016 Presidential election was the CIA, not the GRU.

 

2/2

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 12:56 p.m. No.7573844   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Fact Check: Yes, Warren Is a Millionaire Who Has Received Money from at Least 30 Billionaires over Political Career

 

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D) battled it out in a contentious back and forth over the South Bend mayor’s support from wealthy donors during Thursday’s debate, but Warren — a millionaire herself — has received money from at least 30 billionaires over her political career.

 

Buttigieg and Warren went to war over Buttigieg’s support from billionaires during Thursday’s debate in Los Angeles.

 

“We made the decision many years ago that rich people in smoke-filled rooms would not pick the next president of the United States; billionaires in wine caves should not pick the president of the United States,” Warren said in a jab toward the South Bend mayor.

 

Buttigieg pointed out that he was the only one on the stage who is not a millionaire or billionaire. (Warren’s net worth is $12 million, according to Forbes.)

 

“This is the problem with issuing purity tests you cannot yourself pass,” Buttigieg said.

 

“If I pledge — if I pledge never to be in the company of a progressive Democratic donor, I couldn’t be up here. Senator, your net worth is 100 times mine,” he continued, pointing out the senatorial campaign funds — marking a time when Warren accepted big donor money — she used to cushion her presidential bid.

 

“But also, senator, your presidential campaign right now as we speak is funded in part by money you transferred, having raised it at those exact same big-ticket fundraisers you now denounce,” he said. “Did it corrupt you, senator? Of course not.”

 

Warren did not address his specific critiques but argued that she does not “sell access to my time.”

 

“I don’t do call time with millionaires and billionaires,” she said:

 

Warren is not immune to criticism when it comes to welcoming support from the wealthy. She has accepted support from at least 30 billionaires over the course of her political career.

 

As the New York Post reported:

 

Christopher Sacca, a venture capitalist who appeared on “Shark Tank”, gave $2,800 to Warren in May.

 

The 2020 Democratic presidential candidate also netted two $2,500 contributions from GitHub founder Tom Preston-Werner’s wife, Theresa, in June. That same month Susan Pritzker, wife of Hyatt heir Nicholas Pritzker II, donated $2,500 to Warren.

 

The donations run from 2011 to 2019 and include contributions to Warren’s presidential and Senate campaigns. Most of the individual billionaires are giving at or near the maximum contribution limit, which currently is $2,800 for the primary and $2,800 for the general election for a total for $5,600.

 

That coincides with another point Buttigieg made on Thursday. Warren used $10.4 million in leftover funds from her 2018 senatorial bid to cushion her presidential campaign. During that time, “Warren happily attended fundraisers and accepted money from big donors, sparking questions surrounding her newfound commitment to keep big donors out of politics,” as Breitbart News reported.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/20/fact-check-yes-warren-is-a-millionaire-who-has-received-money-from-at-least-30-billionaires-over-political-career/

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 12:58 p.m. No.7573870   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4075 >>4312 >>4475

Iran president in Tokyo, urges Japan to help rein in US

 

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani has paid a landmark visit to Japan, calling on the country to help confront the United States' bid to wreck the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran.

 

Rouhani became the first Iranian president to visit Japan since 2000 when he landed in Tokyo Friday, his overnight stay seen as the international outreach to the important Middle Eastern country despite US efforts to isolate it.

 

The Iranian president inspected a guard of honor along with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the latter's central Tokyo office before summit talks and a dinner scheduled to last into Friday evening.

 

Despite being a military ally of the US, Japan has traditionally maintained friendly relations with Iran as a major source of energy. In 2017, Iran supplied 5.2 percent of Japan’s crude oil imports.

 

Iran's oil exports, however, have been disrupted by unilateral American sanctions on the Islamic Republic.

 

Japan also relies on the Middle East for nearly 90% of its oil needs, but tensions have risen to new highs amid US deployment of new troops and military assets to the Persian Gulf.

 

Tensions have escalated since President Donald Trump’s decision last year to withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), as the international nuclear agreement with Iran is officially called.

 

“The nuclear deal is an extremely important agreement, and we strongly condemn the US withdrawal, which was one-sided and irrational,” Rouhani said in the meeting with Abe on Friday.

 

“We hope that Japan and other countries in the world will make efforts toward maintaining the agreement,” the Iranian president added.

 

President Rouhani has said that the purpose of his visit to Japan is to discuss the security of the Middle East and calming tensions in the Persian Gulf.

 

Abe plans to dispatch a Self-Defense Force destroyer and patrol plane to the Middle East. He is expected to explain the dispatch plan to Rouhani to seek a green light from Iran for the operation, Japan Times said.

 

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/12/20/614145/Iran-Japan-nuclear-deal-JCPOA-Abe-Rouhani

 

Cabal meeting?!

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 1:01 p.m. No.7573910   🗄️.is 🔗kun

'Gas War' Averted: Russia & Ukraine Agree To Crucial Transit Deal, Defying The Hawks

 

This isn't supposed to happen according to those neo-Cold War pundits who keep telling us Putin is not only bent on taking over Ukraine, but Europe as well — especially through gas and energy dominance.

 

Per FT, a major gas transit deal has been reached between Ukraine and Russia "in principle" and will likely be imminently signed into effect by Moscow and Kiev leadership, ultimately ending a standoff after Ukraine ceased buying gas directly from Gazprom in 2015:

 

European natural gas prices fell sharply on Friday after Russia and Ukraine reached a provisional deal to allow the continued transit of gas to Europe in the new year. A stand-off between the two countries had threatened to disrupt supplies to Europe when the existing contract expires on December 31.

 

…Late on Thursday, Russian energy minister Alexander Novak and his Ukrainian counterpart Oleksiy Orzhel said they had struck an agreement in principle for a new contract, adding that talks were set to continue in Minsk on Friday.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/gas-war-averted-russia-ukraine-agree-crucial-transit-deal-defying-hawks

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 1:03 p.m. No.7573939   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4312 >>4475

Libya's GNA accepts Turkish offer of military support

 

UN-recognised government in Tripoli says it will boost cooperation with Ankara, sources tell Al Jazeera.

 

Libya's United Nations-recognised government has accepted an offer from Turkey for military and logistical support as it seeks to repel an offensive led by forces loyal to renegade military commander Khalifa Haftar.

 

The Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA) said in a statement on Thursday that its cabinet had "unanimously approved the implementation of the memorandum of understanding on security and military cooperation between the GNA and the Turkish government signed on November 27".

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/12/libya-gna-accepts-turkish-offer-military-support-sources-191219130438161.html

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 1:08 p.m. No.7573994   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4016 >>4312 >>4475

Watchdog Asks Court to Subpoena Google for Records Tied to Mystery Clinton-Tied Gmail Account

 

From The Epoch Times:

 

A watchdog group asked a federal judge on Dec. 17 to subpoena Google for records on a Gmail account used to transfer the archive of Hillary Clinton’s emails from her tenure as the secretary of state.

 

Judicial Watch, a conservative government transparency group, filed the request as part of its yearslong litigation against the Department of State. The group is also seeking an interview with Paul Combetta, the information technology specialist who used the Gmail account to transfer all of Clinton’s government emails to an unauthorized private email server.

 

Combetta created the Gmail account—carterheavyindustries@gmail.com—in 2012 and used it to test email issues for his clients. The name of the Gmail account, CarterHeavyIndustries, has fueled suspicions that China gained access to all of Clinton’s emails.

 

An Intelligence Community Inspector General investigator, Frank Rucker, flagged the Gmail account in the metadata of all but four of the emails Clinton’s lawyers handed over to Congress, according to documents released by Sen. Chuck Grassley in August. Rucker became alarmed after searching Google for “Carter Heavy Industries” and coming up with a website for a Chinese company.

 

The inspectors general for the Intelligence Community and the Justice Department reviewed the matter and did not turn up any evidence to link Combetta with the Chinese company. The inspectors general further determined that the Gmail address ended up in the metadata of virtually every email because Combetta used the Gmail account to transfer Clinton’s emails from a laptop to an email server.

 

Although the inspectors general appear to have closed the inquiry into carterheavyindustries@gmail.com, their report on the matter raised a number of new questions, including why Combetta used such a peculiar name for the account, whether any of his clients’ systems were still connected to the Gmail account, and why hundreds of Clinton’s emails were still in the Gmail account years after Combetta transferred the Clinton email archive.

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/in-the-news/watchdog-asks-court-to-subpoena-google-for-records-tied-to-mystery-clinton-tied-gmail-account/

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 1:09 p.m. No.7574020   🗄️.is 🔗kun

WTF

 

Justice Department Announces Addendum to Swiss Bank Program Category 2 Non-Prosecution Agreement with Coutts & Co Ltd.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-addendum-swiss-bank-program-category-2-non-prosecution-agreeme-1

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 1:12 p.m. No.7574052   🗄️.is 🔗kun

ICC prosecutor says Israel committing war crimes, opens investigation

 

"Only sovereign states can delegate criminal jurisdiction to the International Criminal Court. The PA clearly does not meet the criteria," Avichai Mandelblit states.

 

The International Criminal Court prosecutor Fatou Bensouda believes Israel is committing war crimes in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza and has opened an investigation into the matter.

“I am satisfied that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation into the situation in Palestine, pursuant to article 53(1) of the [Rome] Statute,” Bensouda said on Friday in a statement she published on the ICC website.

“In brief, I am satisfied that (i) war crimes have been or are being committed in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip ("Gaza") (for specifics, see paras. 94-96); (ii) potential cases arising from the situation would be admissible; and (iii) there are no substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice,” Benousda said.

In order to better pursue the issue, she has asked the ICC’s pre-trial chamber to rule on the question of whether the ICC has jurisdiction to hear the case, given the special circumstances relating to the territory in question.

“I have sought confirmation that the "territory" over which the Court may exercise its jurisdiction, and which I may subject to investigation, comprises the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza,” she said.

“Such determination is made strictly for the purposes of determining the Court's ability to exercise its jurisdiction and the scope of such jurisdiction under the Statute,” Bensouda said.

She added that this question of jurisdiction must be answered before she can proceed.

“This foundational question should be decided now, and as swiftly as possible in the interests of victims and affected communities,” she said.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that this was a “black day for truth and justice” and a “baseless and scandalous decision.”

“The ICC has been turned into a political weapon in the fight against Israel. They want to twist the fact that Jews live in Israel, in their homeland, into war crime. This is absurd,” Netanyahu said.

Bensouda “completely ignored the serious legal arguments we presented to her. She also ignored truth and history when she said it is a war crime that Jews live in their homeland, the land of the Bible, our ancestral land. We will not be silent. We will not bow to this injustice,” Netanyahu said.

 

https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/A-G-No-ICC-jurisdiction-over-Palestinian-war-crimes-plea-against-Israel-611571

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 1:13 p.m. No.7574064   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4312 >>4475

US Diplomat's Wife Who Killed UK Teen in Car Crash Will Not Voluntarily Return For Trial - Lawyer

 

Anne Sacoolas, the wife of a US diplomat, will not voluntarily return to the United Kingdom to face a possible jail sentence for her involvement in a car crash in Northamptonshire that killed 19-year-old Harry Dunn, Sacoolas' attorney Amy Jeffress said in a statement on Friday.

 

"Anne will not return voluntarily to the United Kingdom to face a potential jail sentence for what was a terrible, but unintentional accident," Jeffress said.

 

Jeffress suggested that criminal prosecution with a potential sentence of 14 years in prison is not a proportionate response to a situation that she characterized as an "accident."

 

Jeffress also said that she and her client have been working with UK authorities to resolve the situation.

 

Earlier in the day, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) of the United Kingdom charged Sacoolas with causing Dunn's death by dangerous driving and said it will proceed with requesting her extradition from the United States.

 

Following the CPS ruling on Friday, UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab welcomed the CPS decision to charge Sacoolas for killing the teenager.

 

"I welcome the taking of a charging decision, which is an important step towards justice for Harry and towards solace for his family, but it is not the end. I hope that Anne Sacoolas will now realise the right thing to do is to come back to the UK and cooperate with the criminal justice process," Raab said in a statement.

 

US State Department reacted on Friday to the decision by British authorities to charge the wife of the US diplomat, saying that the decision is "disappointing and unhelpful".

 

“We are disappointed by today’s announcement and fear that it will not bring a resolution closer. The United States has been clear that, at the time the accident occurred, and for the duration of her stay in the UK, the driver in this case had status that conferred diplomatic immunities,” a State Department spokesperson insisted.

 

On 27 August, Dunn died in a car accident in Northamptonshirecounty, in central England, while riding his motorcycle. Sacoolas, who was driving the vehicle that hit his motorcycle, quickly returned to the United States under diplomatic immunity.

 

https://sputniknews.com/us/201912201077691351-us-diplomats-wife-behind-fatal-uk-car-crash-not-returning-to-country-voluntarily—lawyer/

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 1:15 p.m. No.7574092   🗄️.is 🔗kun

FITTON:COUP: Sure enough, the House coup cabal is now trying to overthrow the Senate by playing around with withholding sham impeachment articles till they get a guarantee of an abusive show trial.

 

The unconstitutional abuse of President Trump will never end.

 

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/fittoncoup-sure-enough-the-house-coup-cabal-is-now-trying-to-overthrow-the-senate-by-playing-around-with-withholding-sham-impeachment-articles-till-they-get-a-guarantee-of-an-abusive-show-trial/

Anonymous ID: 3b1d14 Dec. 20, 2019, 1:18 p.m. No.7574127   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4145 >>4191 >>4227 >>4257 >>4312 >>4475

Vatican publishes new book reducing ‘sin of Sodom’ to ‘lack of hospitality’

 

ROME, December 19, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — In what many see as an effort to normalize homosexuality in the Catholic Church, the Vatican has released a new book that reduces the “sin of Sodom” (Genesis 19:1–29) to “a lack of hospitality.”

 

“The story about the city of Sodom … illustrates a sin that consists in the lack of hospitality, with hostility and violence towards the stranger, a behavior judged to be very serious and therefore deserving to be sanctioned with the utmost severity,” the new book asserts.

 

Sources consulted by LifeSite described the book as “utter banality” and “obviously ridiculous.” One theologian exclaimed, “Thank God this stuff isn’t magisterial.”

 

The new volume, titled What Is Man? An Itinerary of Biblical Anthropology (Che cosa è l’uomo? Un itinerario di antropologia biblica), was released on December 16 by the Pontifical Biblical Commission (PBC) and endeavors to examine the scriptural understanding of the human person. Jesuit Father Pietro Bovati, secretary for the Pontifical Biblical Commission, said the work was carried out at the express wish of Pope Francis.

 

With a preface by Cardinal Luis Ladaria, S.J., prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and president of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, the volume is composed of four chapters: The human being created by God (ch. 1); The human being in the garden (ch. 2); The human family (ch. 3); and the human being in history (ch. 4).

 

Its 10-page treatment of homosexuality comes in chapter three, in a section entitled “transgressive ways” that also includes incest, adultery, and prostitution.

 

The treatment on homosexuality begins by affirming that “the institution of marriage, constituted by the stable relationship between husband and wife, is constantly presented as evident and normative through the entire biblical tradition. There are no examples of legally recognized ‘unions’ between persons of the same sex.”

 

The commission then notes the emergence, particularly in the West, of “voices of dissent” with respect to the “anthropological approach of scripture, as understood and conveyed by the church in its normative aspects.”

 

The authors continue:

 

All this is judged to be a reflection of an archaic, historically conditioned mentality. We know that various biblical affirmations, in the cosmological, biological and sociological spheres, have been gradually considered outdated with the progressive affirmation of the natural and human sciences; similarly — it is deduced by some — a new and more adequate understanding of the human person imposes a radical reservation on the exclusive value of heterosexual unions, in favor of a similar acceptance of homosexuality and homosexual unions as a legitimate and worthy expression of the human being. What is more — it is sometimes argued — the Bible says little or nothing about this type of erotic relationship, which should therefore not be condemned, also because it is often unduly confused with other aberrant sexual behavior. It therefore seems necessary to examine the passages of Sacred Scripture in which the homosexual problem is the subject of homosexuality, in particular those in which it is denounced and criticized

 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-publishes-new-book-reducing-sin-of-sodom-to-lack-of-hospitality