>>7576492
I agree and disagree at the same time - not mutually exclusive or disagreeing totally.
Do you remember LOOP Enterprises?
I tried, Lord knows I tried!! to get my mind around that. I couldn't. Sad but true. It was so large, so complex that without a gigantic wall of whiteboard or strings connecting bits of articles I just couldn't.
That's where the "circular flow diagram" and "expand your thinking" came in. Proofs are great but they are also limited - one topic, one tweet/Q post at a time. NOT knocking proofs, they are important. Just they are only one form of presenting the information. But limited. Too many arrows boggle most people and their eyes glaze over and the mental wall slams down shut tight.
We have to adapt our methods, just as normalfags have to adapt to the new reality we show them. This was a stretch for me, new territory. These are what that anon claims he sent to his MIL friends, both INT and PSYOPS. I actually had to make them to make it clear in my own mind - I could not understand for years why the fuck we should care if IR or NK had nukes because they can't use them without being instantly turned to glass… this was just to organize the info/intel in a way that made sense.
So I guess what I'm saying is that the production of infographics helps -us- to organize large amounts of the data, and also those we share it with (the public) and using my own graphics as an example.
There are other topics that really need to be 'boiled down' in the same manner (perhaps more creatively and aesthetically) so we can fulfill our task
>make graphics to calm and educate the public during and after the Storm