>>7586119 pb
>Direct quote from Nunes: "There's people all over the globe that helped - aid this."
right
doesn't say anons or q followers
from previous context,
implies Bongino listeners on twitter
(although we would be among them)
anons always eager to see shoutouts
we would be better to be conservative
with claims like this
careful, cautious, and most of all--anon
o7
BO/BVs still need to correct page header
red text, in case one of em is lurking (see global notables, guise)
often find it takes repeated requests for stuff like locking breds. That's unfortunate, bc even if they are not trying to fuck around,it creates a chance for shills to make mischief and can be taken as a sign of passive aggressive behavior
That is preventable, but only they choose to demonstrate their support with better comms and supportive actions. Sincerely hope they choose the high road.
>>7586249 Merkel wants to make Internet service providers hand over data including passwords of those charged with 'hate speech"
seconded
Understand, anon.
Have experience with previous problems. They have always been lazy since the start–starting with the "complacent bakers" post by @fj in April. Didn't want to help with vetting even tho bakers supported that (bc managers are the only ones who have the hashes).
And then there was the later post refusing to provide anons with info on when to expect BVs to be around. @fj tried to make it about security–but that's dumb, and prolly untrue.
Just saw a post by an anon in this bred remarking he'd been here 15 hours today. There are moar than a few who spend that kind of time on this board. And who would respond very quickly to any request for revised info on the top of the board.
(BTW, "patriots awoken" is also not available a the moment–another thing to look at, don't know whether it's coming back or not, but something should be done about dead link.)
Have been bending over backwards to give board managers the benefit of the doubt in order to encourage better behavior.
But too often it looks like
>no one's minding the store
Yes, they are here sometimes, but for how long? Maybe the only way to get their attn is to put in a Report. Do they spend any time in the bread? What does it take to get a response?
unfortunately, there are certain things that only BO/BVs can do.
How are anons supposed to change stuff at the top of the board?
BUT
anons should never ask BO to intervene when it comes to what is in the DOUGH–that's crossing the line. As most of us know very well. (I assume those kind of requests for "help" come from trouble-making shills.)
Jim and Ron maintain an image board website.
BO is "owner" of one of the boards.
J & R do not interfere with the boards.
Do not lump them all together.
(Unless yr a shill trying to confuse things on purpose.)
>>7586655 How Big Tech Manipulates Academia to Avoid Regulation
notable
None of the posts this bred focuses on 8bit
why would you put THAT in notables??
completely irrelevant
ur flying blind, might as well say it's Jim Corney who's BO–or Santa Claus.
>call for diggs
tell ya what–you go dig and come back with SAUCED evidence and we'll see
ah, getting called 'retard' is music to my ears
anjel would say anything for attention
all the shills backed up @fj last Spring
>>triggered clown
been called worse