Hey Muh-Joo Shill / Dick Pick Anon / Fake Christian.
How do you get around the "flood detected"?
Why do you pretend to morally superior as Muh-Joo Shill and then also post Dick Picks. I have a suspicion you are also GorePornFag.
Check out my flowchart of discovery where I show you are Dick Pick Anon and Muh-Joo Shill.
You like?
>PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF!!!!!
>KEKEKEKEKEKEK!!!!!
You sure are trying hard to convince you didn't just get caught being a degenerate hypocrite. I like all the capital letters, bold wording and exclamation points, as well as the diversion tactic away from what I am claiming.
Typical shill.
Still can't answer with any straight wording any of my questions, can you?
You do "suck this bad".
How do you get around "flood detected" when regular anons aren't allowed?
Why do you spam dick pics?
I look forward to your earnest and straightforward reply to my simple questions.
I actually posted alphanumerical ID through Tor a couple breads back. However, I was also connected through clearnet at the same time in a different browser. I thought it interesting…
As I've been saying, ad hominems don't work on me. Please try to learn this, I shouldn't have to repeat it so many times.
Now…. about my questions…
How to you avoid "flood detected" when other anons can't?
Why do you post dick pics?
Why do you pretend to be a Fake Christian who is rude and hateful and not at all christian-like?
Any straightforward answers to my simple questions? Please avoid diversion tactics and ad hominem attacks, since those don't work.
Repeating the question in bold red isn't a logical answer to the question. Why can't you answer a simple question? Bring your answer forth into the light.
Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Abusive Ad Hominem / Character Assassination / Smear Campaign / Throwing Stones
Sometimes, an attempt is made to discredit the person through tactics such as name-calling or character assassination rather than addressing the evidence.
Often, this takes the form of trying to embarrass another person or group of persons rather than dealing with the evidence in a rational way.
A person has a belief that is based on assumptions and made-up stories. Someone starts to get close to exposing that under all the supposed evidence is no rational basis for thought. The person starts a smear campaign against the other person to shut them up. After executing an abusive ad hominem attack, the person feels totally justified and is more convinced than ever before that the "evidence" is valid. This person never realizes that the so-called "evidence" is based on assumptions and made-up stories.
Still gotcha by the balls. Why don't you answer ANY of my questions? Because you can't? Because you will expose yourselves further as the clowns you are?
Here are my SIMPLE questions again. Try to focus on giving clear insightful answers instead of ad hominem attacks, which are pathetic.
How do you get around "flood detected" when regular anons aren't allowed?
Why do you spam dick pics?
Why do you pretend to be a type of christian who is fake and who understandably causes revulsion?
Why are you a deceiver?
It's hilarious how you respond like a spastic when the other anon seemingly opens a window of opportunity for you. Still…. doesn't work. No matter how many times you copy paste bold red text.