>>7597529
>The Infection is not the Host.
Nonsense. You have clearly never read and understood Pike's "Morals and Dogma". All Freemasonry after Pike is Luciferianism. The "Host" is The Infection.
And I thoroughly disagree with your intrepretation of what Q said about Freemasons.
>>7597529
>Q specifically said that the Power some Masons collected/achieved corrupted them, more than 'they were infiltrated [by what I presumed to be the C_A]'
When comparing your statement to what Q actually said, I believe you are reading way more into it than what Q actually said.
ββββββββββββββ
Most all powerful organizations have sinister components.
With power comes corruption.
Like alphabet agencies, not all are bad apples.
Should the bad spoil the bunch?
Q
ββββββββββββββ
Q didn't (specifically) say "that the Power some Masons collected/achieved corrupted them" as you seem to think. Q clearly said that "most powerful organizations have sinister components". Q said that "all are not bad apples". I read this to mean that within the whole of the body of Freemasonry, that not all are sinister.
These are the Freemasons who the upper degrees of Freemasonry call the "Outer Portico" Freemasons. Initiated, having neither understood the symbols and the rituals which they have viewed and performed. Is this not stated in Morals and Dogma?