Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 22, 2019, 9:18 p.m. No.7596803   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>6955

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

bUt HoW dO yOu BeAt fLoOd DeTeCtEd?!

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 22, 2019, 11:41 p.m. No.7597377   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>7597343

I didn't necessarily take it that way. More of a confirmation of who Q+ is via the meme. I was going to say this hours ago, but it seems to me that as The Plan unfolds, there will be more people with direct knowledge of Q and The Plan. It started out with 3 civilians and 7 military in the loop. I am thinking that maybe as many as 5 people have been added to the civilian side of the equation. Namely, Graham, Cruz, and Ratcliffe.

 

Graham for obvious reasons. Cruz, because it wasn't hard to gain his loyalty after he realized that the DS and the Dems were spying on him and going to fuck him over. Ratcliffe, because he is on the Intelligence Cmmte and two days ago stated that he has seen classified data that proves that SPYGATE leads directly to Obammy.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 22, 2019, 11:58 p.m. No.7597431   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7446

>>7597379

>>7597382

>NOTABLE

 

This made notables 5 months ago.

On. The. Day. It. Happened.

 

Does anyone even bother to check previous Notables and qresear.ch before filling up the current bread with news Notables from 5 months ago? qresear.ch is your friend.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 23, 2019, 12:19 a.m. No.7597470   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7477 >>7481

>>7597446

>>>7597431

>

>i did check in QResear.ch

>

>the actual twat did not comes up there

 

Days before Midler's tweet, we were already digging on her because of her running her mouth about POTUS. And while Q Twatter followers were talking about Midler's twatter about Terra Mar on the day she posted, it was posted here within 72 hours. So, not on the exact day HERE. But when searching qresear.ch, it comes up for me just fine.

 

#7258543 at 2019-07-30 16:48:51 (UTC+1) >>7257827 Bette Midler twat: It's Oceans Day at my house…

 

>>>7597431

>will post what is here, you guise decide what you want, sometimes useful for jogging the memory, but it's a judgment call

 

Yeah. I get that. Just so tired of seeing things already in the Notables being reposted as if it is something new. If it is pertinent to current digs, then of course, by all means. It just shows that people don't bother to check the Notables and Qresearch before filling up the bread with old crumbs.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 23, 2019, 12:38 a.m. No.7597483   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7487 >>7490 >>7491 >>7495

>>7597477

>If we need to see something posted 50 times it's not a waste of bread, it's an important fact to build a strong understanding of.

 

Literally needless to say.

 

>>7597477

>If people don't know what has been posted before it's always worth reposting

 

A self-cancelling and irrelevant statement, considering my point was that so many anons don't bother to check Notables and qresear.ch before posting in the first place.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 23, 2019, 12:44 a.m. No.7597489   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>7597481

>there is no perfect system for eliminating redundancy

 

Yeah, true enough. As far as keeping as notables - I would leave it up to you, if you see it as relevant to other, current, digs.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 23, 2019, 12:56 a.m. No.7597499   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7502 >>7505 >>7520

>>7597487

>Yeah, because your shame is helping anyone

 

Pointing out that anons should check Notables and Qresear.ch before posting a five (5) month old Midler twatter (and calling it NOTABLE), was helping.

 

>>7597487

>It's clear you don't know what a hivemind can do

 

Uh huh. Sure thing, Sparky. You judge me and insinuate what I don't know, while you yourself know absolutely nothing about me. Some people just like to run their mouths.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 23, 2019, 1:01 a.m. No.7597508   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7524

>>7597495

>look at what we have found and saved for everyone to make their own decision. This won't work unless people chose to see the truth and what they believe.

 

Rather, it won't work when people don't bother to read what "we have found and saved for everyone". It was fairly obvious that my sole point was that people aren't using the Notables and Qresear.ch.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 23, 2019, 1:19 a.m. No.7597545   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>7597498

Everything you said. Exactly.

 

>>7597503

>but would you direct your parents to qmap.pub before directing them to the front lines to see all the shilling.

 

Exactly.

 

>>7597503

>Baby steps for newfags

 

Yes. Which should include the understanding that they might bother to check Notables and Qresearch before posting news not directly pertinent to any current digs on the bread, let alone nominating news that is five months stale crumbs as Notable.

 

>>7597502

I hear ya. I hear ya. kek

 

:::BREAKING NEWS:::

Local radio hosts in Dallas, Texas, have been reporting that President Kennedy's motorcade has fallen under gunfire in Dealey Plaza and that the President may have been fatally wounded.

:::TOTALLY NOTABLE:::

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 23, 2019, 1:47 a.m. No.7597591   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7599 >>7608

>>7597529

>The Infection is not the Host.

 

Nonsense. You have clearly never read and understood Pike's "Morals and Dogma". All Freemasonry after Pike is Luciferianism. The "Host" is The Infection.

 

And I thoroughly disagree with your intrepretation of what Q said about Freemasons.

 

>>7597529

>Q specifically said that the Power some Masons collected/achieved corrupted them, more than 'they were infiltrated [by what I presumed to be the C_A]'

 

When comparing your statement to what Q actually said, I believe you are reading way more into it than what Q actually said.

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”

 

Most all powerful organizations have sinister components.

 

With power comes corruption.

Like alphabet agencies, not all are bad apples.

 

Should the bad spoil the bunch?

 

Q

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”

 

Q didn't (specifically) say "that the Power some Masons collected/achieved corrupted them" as you seem to think. Q clearly said that "most powerful organizations have sinister components". Q said that "all are not bad apples". I read this to mean that within the whole of the body of Freemasonry, that not all are sinister.

 

These are the Freemasons who the upper degrees of Freemasonry call the "Outer Portico" Freemasons. Initiated, having neither understood the symbols and the rituals which they have viewed and performed. Is this not stated in Morals and Dogma?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 23, 2019, 2:03 a.m. No.7597642   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7675

>>7597599

Learn to read. That wasn't my quote. I quoted the quote from the anon who was defending Freemasonry, of which there is no defense. It is Luciferian in design. The lower initiates of Freemasonry don't even understand the symbols and rituals. Q didn't defend Freemasonry, Q said that not all of the people within Freemasonry are "bad apples".

 

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”-

1632

Sinister Components in Most Powerful Organizations

Q

!CbboFOtcZs

28 Jun 2018 - 6:04:44 PM

Anonymous

28 Jun 2018 - 5:23:08 PM

Make Freemasonry Great Again.

The Clowns infiltrated it and have been abusing it's hierarchy for far too long.

>>1947578

Most all powerful organizations have sinister components.

With power comes corruption.

Like alphabet agencies, not all are bad apples.

Should the bad spoil the bunch?

Q

 

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”-

 

Which is an accurate statement for two reasons: 1) Most men who join Freemasonry do it for the business/networking/connections and 2) Have been purposely deceived into partaking in rituals and shown symbols that they did not understand.

 

Does not Morals and Dogma specifically state this?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 23, 2019, 2:09 a.m. No.7597662   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7675 >>7677

>>7597608

>>>7597591

>

>You don't understand Masonry, and seem quick to blame the host.

 

So says the Blue Lodge, Outer Portico Freemason. Because there are only two choices as to why you would defend Freemasonry:

1) You are ignorant of facts.

2) You are Blue Lodge, hoodwinked fool.

 

Since you claim that I know nothing about Freemasonry, you must apparently be an expert. So, why don't you tell us whether it is true or not…

 

Does Freemasonry purposely deceive it's Initiates?

Are 3rd Degree Freemason's purposely misled into believing that they understand Freemasonry's rituals and symbols?

 

Yes or no, Brainiac?