Anonymous ID: 57d3c2 Dec. 23, 2019, 4:29 a.m. No.7597952   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7959 >>8020

Even when individual authors do not adhere to the bias of AP Style, it often doesn't matter. If they submit an article to a mainstream media outlet, they will likely see their words edited to conform. A pro-life author who submits a piece taking a position against abortion will see the words "pro-life" changed to "anti-abortion," because the AP Stylebook instructs, "Use anti-abortion instead of pro-life and pro-abortion rights instead of pro-abortion or pro-choice." It goes on, "Avoid abortionist," saying the term "connotes a person who performs clandestine abortions."

 

Words related to terrorism are sanitized in the AP Stylebook. Militant, lone wolves or attackers are to be used instead of terrorist or Islamist. "People struggling to enter Europe" is favored over "migrant" or "refugee." While it's true that many struggle to enter Europe, it is accurate to point out that they are, in fact, immigrants or refugees.

 

"Illegal immigrant" and "undocumented" aren't acceptable anymore either. "Illegals" and "alien" were already forbidden a few years ago. Although "illegal immigration" is still acceptable, it's not clear what words are supposed to replace the forbidden words. The word "amnesty" contains no reference to illegal immigrants, instead instructing, "See pardon, parole, probation."

https:

//thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/341210-how-the-ap-stylebook-censors-pro-life-and-other-conservative-words?fbclid=IwAR3Dms2nqoo8FBE5tr-w4eV9veYNIwQl-gDA0iVkEZqngZAhreaJrmyuTGc

Anonymous ID: 57d3c2 Dec. 23, 2019, 4:45 a.m. No.7598006   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7597989

It's like a physician book for journalists.

Anyway, I hang out here very little, I scan past the new penis marathon posts and "Are you here for an argument " looking for new research to read.