lawfag here

just rewad the house filing in support of their mcgahn etc testimony

100% irrelevant and immaterial

the whole thing argues they needz this testimony and why

well even if that is 100% true it ignores the actual legal question which is

are they entitled to subpoena it?

and the answer is NO because they chose to avoid a full house vote on articles of muhimpeachment which would have granted them such power

CASE FUKING CLOSED