Anonymous ID: a3c697 Dec. 24, 2019, 1:37 p.m. No.7611767   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1805 >>1901 >>2155

>>7611607

thx baker. Have a feeling this anon just has a tablet. Just looked up prices on win10 laptops–can get for as little as ~170-$200 (Lenovo, ASUS), 4 star reviews. Small screens but 4gb ram–that's enough to do real work.

Anonymous ID: a3c697 Dec. 24, 2019, 1:55 p.m. No.7611902   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7611636

>>7611496

>>7611499

>https://theamericanreport.org/2019/12/24/fisa-judge-rosemary-collyers-order-destroy-surveillance-data-collected-on-and-before-march-17-2017-date-the-hammer-cia-fbi-wiretap-on-trump-was-exposed/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork

 

Upon checking the net, can find no other corroborating source for this claim. I do see the passages that appear to support it, but why hasn't this story been picked up (at least by an alt-media source like Epoch Times, Breitbart or somebody else)? Strange.

Anonymous ID: a3c697 Dec. 24, 2019, 2:23 p.m. No.7612105   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7612028

Shills have been intense since replatforming, showed up in droves just as soon as the worst tech problems were fixed.

 

>>7612034

>Do NOT demolish their intentionally flawed arguments

Agree that it's a bad idea to let fake narratives take hold. Info warfare 101 says that repetition of fake news is the best way to spread disinformation.

 

I tend to respond to blended arguments that play upon known sore spots for anons (e.g., the idea of "paytriots" or "name-fagging"). Anything that can potentially trigger us in a way that will bypass conscious awareness and produce an instant emotional reaction. That kind of stuff is worth challenging.