Anonymous ID: bbba20 Dec. 24, 2019, 1:33 p.m. No.7611741   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1771 >>1965 >>2161

Very local "It's Happening" for me.

https://globalnews.ca/news/6331320/burlington-man-arrested-human-trafficking-mount-nemo-mansion-raid/

 

Possible alias to dig.

 

They say the accused has gone by multiple aliases, including Gerry Aholowalia, Jarry Mohan Ahlowalia, Jarry Awalia, Mohan J. Walia, M.J. Awalia, Jarry Ahluwalia, Mohan Ahuwalia, Jarry Aโ€™Walia and Jarry Walia.

Anonymous ID: bbba20 Dec. 24, 2019, 1:50 p.m. No.7611859   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2006

>>7611830

Super funny how all force equations require gravity to work then?

 

Please show any equation of force work without gravity and replaced by your theory.

 

https://home.fnal.gov/~cheung/rtes/RTESWeb/LQCD_site/pages/calculatingtheforces.htm

Anonymous ID: bbba20 Dec. 24, 2019, 2:07 p.m. No.7612008   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2037

>>7611988

So you just make up answers based on no data? Any logical person will use the available data until more reliable data is proven to be more accurate. Not before that point. Stop disproving points and try to prove one of your own.

Anonymous ID: bbba20 Dec. 24, 2019, 2:15 p.m. No.7612052   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7612039

 

Or just yell that people are lying to you about gravity for some unknown reason with zero benefit to the lie? Who gains from holding on to this massive lie they are telling you?

 

Density is not possible without mass. Calculating density is impossible without PREVIOUSLY knowing the mass.

Anonymous ID: bbba20 Dec. 24, 2019, 2:22 p.m. No.7612098   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2119

>>7612070

If one can raise questions without causing an argument you might be right. Any time someone questions this argument, [You] go off the handle and cannot have a rational discussion about the details. Just screaming.

 

When you can actually create a scenario in which your facts actually match our reality then maybe people will listen. Your only card is to scream "No Gravity" without actually giving a viable alternative for what we already know.

 

While I completely understand the Density vs Gravity argument and see how it can be confusing, too many valid theories rely on the little "g" in the equation. When you can repeat those equations and get the same result it grants some validity to the argument.

 

When the argument is just โ€”- you are wrong. People stop listening.

 

Stop disproving my point and try to prove your own.