Anonymous ID: 9e38e0 Dec. 25, 2019, 4:11 a.m. No.7616864   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6872 >>6891 >>6894 >>6918 >>7176 >>7320 >>7559

Red Text still sux.

>>7616394 pb

So Colliers is ordering destruction of evidence that points to her own crimes?

Sick

https://theamericanreport.org/2019/12/24/fisa-judge-rosemary-collyers-order-destroy-surveillance-data-collected-on-and-before-march-17-2017-date-the-hammer-cia-fbi-wiretap-on-trump-was-exposed/?

 

Didn't she sign a FISA on Flynn also?

After she was tipped off by Rogers that there was illegal surveillance.

Maybe somebody else has a time-line handy.

 

She made the order the 24th yesterday.

So when faced with the fact she pressured now into making the FISA docs public, she's now ordering the destruction of evidence?

really?

I thought she's been replaced.

How can she make such and order if she's stepped down?

Anonymous ID: 9e38e0 Dec. 25, 2019, 4:34 a.m. No.7616894   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7176

>>7616864

Didn't she sign a FISA on Flynn also?

should have read

"didn't Colliers approve a FISA on Flynn also?"

Wouldn't anyone say she's in "hot water"

Why can she make an order like that when she's supposed to step down?

 

P.S. Merry Christmas

Anonymous ID: 9e38e0 Dec. 25, 2019, 4:42 a.m. No.7616908   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6919 >>6933 >>7176

>>7616891

How could it be published dec 26th 2019?

That's tomorrow.

 

Thanks for the clarification.

The timing of the Order she gave still gives the appearance of Obstruction?

A Judge can certainly be charged with "Obstruction of Justice"

Would be total nonsense if they could do whatever they want?

She saw the facts were coming out, and then covered her ass?

is there another explanation?

 

No she's stepped down already and a new Judge was already appointed? I saw that. Am I wrong?. The order was done before she stepped down? April 26th 2017

Anonymous ID: 9e38e0 Dec. 25, 2019, 4:53 a.m. No.7616931   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6967

"history" is 100 % BS falsified.

Jaynes glows like hell

All he pontificates about is "based" on his total speculation.

Look at his premises:

Main premise of "Jaynes" He's knows it all snf doesn't need any evidence.

Reminds me of Langley. Ridiculous story-tellers. .

kek

To study "consciousness" you would have to study your own? What is most close at hand?

>>7616899

Guy is guilty of way too much text.

Glowing Pedant.

Total BS speculation.

Anonymous ID: 9e38e0 Dec. 25, 2019, 5:14 a.m. No.7616967   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Look closer.

Where are the citations, listing of primary sources, footnotes.?

MIssing Absent.

Reminds me of Ann Coulter, She does put in footnotes though, yet none of them check -out; boils down to the same thing.

>>7616931

>>7616899

http://s-f-walker.org.uk/pubsebooks/pdfs/Julian_Jaynes_The_Origin_of_Consciousness.pdf

Anonymous ID: 9e38e0 Dec. 25, 2019, 5:27 a.m. No.7617015   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

If you take it as Fiction. I think it's totally cool.

Be sure to write a book report because I could never slog through all that.

And would be interested to see your take.,

Anonymous ID: 9e38e0 Dec. 25, 2019, 6:19 a.m. No.7617233   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7247 >>7285

>>7617007

>>7617212

The white hats just took over the FISC already approved.

Or the black hats just had to approve some for POTUS

Doesn't mean FISC is honest and doesn't need to be disbanded..

The whole "War on Terror" is a fucking snow -job

They need to come clean and retire at the very least. Even if there are no consequences.

They must stop lying.

Anonymous ID: 9e38e0 Dec. 25, 2019, 6:39 a.m. No.7617313   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7480

7616918

>>7616943

Yes the judge is dirty . Come out in the OIG/

She was warned the warrants were no good, and kept approving them

"AGENCY' is covering for her since they need their precious Secret Court. And need to keep what its been up to secret.

Judge is dirty dirty and so is Roberts who appointed them

So many dirty judges, so little time.