Anonymous ID: eeb4c6 Dec. 26, 2019, 12:07 a.m. No.7623133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3224

>>7622985

Not a lawfag but after reviewing the Constitution, Article I Section 2 and 3, and below definition of impeachment from Black's Law Dictionary 2d Addition, it sounds like POTUS is correct in stating that the Senate can set the date for the Impeachment Trail without Speaker Pelosi submitting the Articles. And until the Impeachment Articles have gone to trial in the Senate they are nothing more than an accusation.

 

>IMPEACHMENT

 

TheLaw.com Law Dictionary & Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.

 

(A) const. law, punishments. Under the constitution and laws of the United States, an impeachment may be described to be a written accusation, by the house of representatives of the United States, to the senate of the United States, against an officer. The presentment, written accusation, is called articles of impeachment. 2. The constitution declares that the house of representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment art. 1, s. 2, cl. 5 and that the senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments. Art. 1, s. 3, cl. 6. 3. The persons liable to impeachment are the president, vice-president, and all civil officers of the United States. Art. 2, s. 4. 4. The offences for which a guilty officer may be impeached are, treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors. Art. 2, s. 4. The constitution defines the crime of treason. Art. 3, s. 3. Recourse must be had to the common law for a definition of bribery. Not having particularly mentioned what is to be understood by other high crimes and misdemeanors, resort, it is presumed, must be had to parliamentary practice, and the common law, in order to ascertain what they are. 5. The mode of proceeding, in the institution and trial of impeachments, is as follows: When a person who may be legally impeached has been guilty, or is supposed to have been guilty, of some malversation in office, a resolution is generally brought forward by a member of the house of representatives, either to accuse the party, or for a committee of inquiry. If the committee report adversely to the party accused, they give a statement of the charges, and recommend that he be impeached; when the resolution is adopted by the house, a committee is appointed to impeach the party at the bar of the senate, and to state that the articles of impeachment against him will be exhibited in due time, and made good before the senate, and to demand that the senate take order for the appearance of the party to answer to the impeachment. The house then agree upon the articles of impeachment, and they are presented to the senate by a committee appointed by the house to prosecute the impeachment; the senate then issues process, summoning the party to appear at a given day before them, to answer to the articles. The process is served by the sergeant-at-arms of the senate, and a return is made of it to the senate, under oath. On the return-day of the process, the senate resolves itself into a court of impeachment, and the senators are sworn to do justice, according to the constitution and laws. The person impeached is called to answer, and either appears or does not appear. If he does not appear, his default is recorded, and the senate may proceed ex parte. If he does appear, either by himself or attorney, the parties are required to form an issue, and a time is then assigned for the trial. The proceedings on the trial are conducted substantially as they are upon common judicial trials. If any debates arise among the senators, they are conducted in secret, and the final decision is given by yeas and nays; but no person can be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present. Const. art. 1, s. 2, cl. 6. 6. When the president is tried, the chief justice shall preside. The judgment, in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. Proceedings on impeachments under the state constitutions are somewhat similar. Vide Courts of the United States. (B) evidence. An allegation, supported by proof, that a witness who has been examined is unworthy of credit. 2. Every witness is liable to be impeached as to his character for truth; and, if his general character is good, he is presumed, at all times, to be ready to support it.

 

https://dictionary.thelaw.com/impeachment/

 

Additionally, Rekieta Law provides some good insights on the only impeachment dispute the Supreme Court has ruled on.

Anonymous ID: eeb4c6 Dec. 26, 2019, 12:26 a.m. No.7623174   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3193

>>7623038

This is a fair critism.

 

>Dark to Light

 

This verbiage is straight out of Masonry. And of course, Luciferianism (synonymous).

 

8Kun and the NSA symbolism is the Ouroboros, another satanic symbol.

 

The counter arguement I would put forward would be, the Bible tells us to judge according to the fruits. Are the fruits of Q good or evil? So far, they are good, from what I can see.

 

Also, nice ID.

Anonymous ID: eeb4c6 Dec. 26, 2019, 12:45 a.m. No.7623230   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3238 >>3244

>>7623193

I agree fren. I sometimes reflect however in George Orwell's 1984,

 

>The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivis, by: Emmanuel Goldstein

 

was just anothor, more advanced form of control by the State.

 

Is it possible Q is something like that? Maybe. Several times Q has mentioned that this Plan is about the peaceful accountability of trailers. The goal being no civil unrest. I can understand, because Q has to calculate for foreign enemies looking for opportunities to take advantage of.

 

But if there isn't a major effort to publicly punish all the High Profile traitors, the public pressure for unrest and action may go beyond control.

 

Just look at the rise in Boogaloo memes and groups to get a feel for where the patriotic normies are at.

 

At the end of the day, my faith is in God. The Lord Jesus Christ. May he bless, protect, give victory, and save the souls of all those on the Q Team and Q+. Let his will be done.