>>7624350 (pb)
>When we speak of groups, we are not speaking about all individuals in that group, we are analyzing group behavior patterns, not judging collectively all individuals in that group.
The above is:
-
Begging the question because you are not actually explicitly positing what 'group' means by hastily denying it doesn't mean all of the individuals;
-
Committing the fallacy of scientism to teleological phenomena such as human thought and actions, and attributing to individuals a chemistry/physics concept of 'patterns' based on historical numerical statistics.
You say by 'group' you're not speaking of all of the individuals within the group, but rather 'group behavior patterns'.
Without qualification of EXACTLY WHICH INDIVIDUALS are being referred to by 'group behavior patterns', you are necessarily making a universal claim that it includes all of the individuals in that group.
You can't obligate others to name for you what you yourself are obligated to name by virtue of making a positive claim about any individuals in a group.
>It's simple: individuals should be judged by their individual actions and decisions, and that does not make groups and group behavior analysis any less legitimate or any less necessary, because: groups exist, and they affect each other.
This is a self-contradictory argument. You can't have a world where humans act and think as individuals, and a world where there is acting and thinking of group concepts.
ALL human affairs are 100% a function of the individual actions of all of the individuals being considered.
Even if 10,000 soldiers in formation all said in unison "We", there is no aggregate 'group' mind or action that is driving the "We". It's still individuals making their own choices to say it.
>And the reason why Jewish collective power needs to be closely looked at by everyone in the gen pop is this: Jewish collective power is the most subversive force operating in the West right now, and that threat needs to be terminated (peacefully and fairly, off course).
You're committing the fallacy of hypostatization, and you are contradicting yourself.
There is no '[race/religion] collective power' apart from the power wielded by specific individuals to which the concept 'collective' occurs.
You're pushing a collectivist/leftist ideology on how we're supposed to view Jews, and if you're consistent everyone would be perceived as members of a 'collective' first and foremost, and that would in turn encompass the entirety of how all humans are to be perceived.
Nobody in your ideology are actually individuals. They're all means to the ends of a 'tribe' force.
I could post meme after meme after meme of criminals who are White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, etc, and then make fallacious claims of how these memes 'prove' the existence of 'white collective power', 'black collective power', and 'asian collective power', and then also fallaciously accuse anyone who rejects what I am saying to be 'denying the facts.
"What, you're saying I'm wrong about [race/religion]? Look at all of the example memes I posted, that are 'facts' about this destructive '[race/religion] group behavior patterns'. I LOVE TRIGGERING YOU DENIERS who refuse to accept these 'facts' that I posted!"
Q is in agreement to what I am writing, and contradicts what you are writing, by the way.
You're trying to divide all of humanity into jews and non-jews.
Jewish and non-Jewish individuals are supposedly thinking and acting according to a reality that is metaphysically incompatible with each other, in antagonism with each other.
THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED BY RACE
THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED BY RELIGION
THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED BY POLITICAL AFFILIATION
You are posting a narrative that DIVIDES THE HUMAN RACE.
WE SEE YOU, WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE