The cabal trying to destroy Boeing as it represents a huge part of the US economy. Fucking Airbus had rudders falling off aircraft in the late 90's and didn't get the kind of months long focus by the media that Boeing is today, even after 'one of the deadliest crashes in US history'.

"The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued a May 28 recommendation based on its findings that the RTL did not limit rudder movement as designed when an American Airlines [AMR] A300-600 involved in a 1997 stall event experienced rapid airspeed changes that outran the limiter’s ability to keep up. As a result, the tailfin was stressed beyond ultimate load, which eventually required replacement of the composite tailfin. Ultimate load is the 50 percent safety factor added to limit load, which represents the greatest force expected to be encountered in service. The incident airplane, operating as Flight 903 at the time, experienced rudder reversals as a consequence of four rudder inputs in opposing directions. Reversals, or rapid rudder deflections from one side to the other without stopping at the neutral position, can induce yawing that places great stress on the tailfin, rapidly building aerodynamic forces the fin was not designed to withstand."

"Another American A300-600 operating as Flight 587 experienced a series of rudder reversals in November 2001, leading again to ultimate load and, this time, to fin separation. The airplane crashed into Belle Harbor, N.Y., killing all 260 aboard and five persons on the ground. It was one of the deadliest crashes in North American aviation history. NTSB sources close to the Flight 587 investigation tell ASW that additional rudder design recommendations are likely."

This has nothing to do with the safety of the MAX, and everything to do with cabal trying to harm the US economy and thereby Trump.

Even after multiple incidences of rudder separation/failure, the Airbus kept flying, no grounding and months of bad press for them.

>>7626050

Really? So why was it when a PRIMARY FLIGHT CONTROL surface was litterally falling off Airbus planes the were not grounded?

Primary flight control means required to maintain controlled flight ie not crash.

Why no grounding for a far more severe issue than a software problem (if that's even really true, MAX flew for several years with perfect safety record).?

That bullshit about the 737 MAX being notable is crap. This is cabal sabotage of the American economy and thereby Trump.

Fucking Scarebus had rudders falling off their planes in the late 90's and the NTSB did not ground them and they were not punished for months in the media with bad press.

Having a primary flight control surface fucking fall off the plane is FAR FAR worse than a software bug in a stall prevention system, the rudder is required for normal fucking flight, not the quasi emergency of a stall.

So much bullshit in the fake news cabal media, Boeing does not deserve the level of media coverage that it's getting, this is about harming the booming US economy.

Airbus never grounded it's planes and there was little media coverage other than the horrific crash that cost hundreds of lives in a NY suburb.

"NEW YORK, Nov. 12 (UPI) – An American Airlines A300 Airbus carrying 246 passengers and nine crew members crashed in a residential neighborhood of New York's Queens borough shortly after takeoff from JFK airport Monday, the Federal Aviation Administration said.

The crash of American Flight 587, en route to Santo Domingo in the Dominican Republic, set off fires in a number of buildings, with the fire scene encompassing a four-block area."

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/2001/11/12/American-Airlines-jet-crashes-in-QueensNY/68671005587263/

How many Boeing MAX aircraft crashed in the US? Zero?

Was Airbus grounded after multiple incidents where the rudder broke off the plane? No? Gee, I wonder why not? Cabal trying to ruin the US economy by pushing the Boeing MAX story? Yes, of course, wake up!

"After some investigation and a great deal of looking the other way, aviation authorities blamed the dead pilot for over correcting, using too much rudder peddle during turbulence, and decided not to fix the obvious structural problem with ALL Airbus A300 aircraft. Grounding the fleet to correct a major structural defect would be very expensive and politically incorrect. See Wikipedia Article on Flight 587

It is generally unacceptable for an airplane to come apart in mid flight from air turbulence. It is unacceptable for an airplane to come apart in mid-flight from pilot over controlling the rudder. It is especially unacceptable when the structural failure kills 265 men, women, and children.

The tail structure of the Airbus A300 is made of carbon fiber and plastic. Its structural and fatigue characteristics should be classified as “experimental.” The death of 265 people in Queens, NYC, on November 12, 2001 demonstrated clearly to anyone with half a brain that the plastic tail of the A300 is not strong enough to be trusted with the lives of passengers.

Instead of redesigning and strengthening the plastic vertical stabilizers, Airbus used the same design on its enlarged A330 model. If the vertical stabilizer is not strong enough for the A300, it clearly is even more dangerous on the enlarged A330 mode. But fixing bad design costs money and its only the lives of passengers that is at stake. Airbus got away with it until last week."

"On May 31, 2008, Air France Flight 440, an Airbus A330, ran into some turbulence en route from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to Paris, France. Wikipedia Article The vertical stabilizer broke off. Flight 440 was traveling at high altitude and high speed when it lost all directional control. When the plane turns sideways at high speed, wind forces rip it to pieces. It dumped bodies and shreds of cabin with floating insulation over a wide area. Once again, the broken vertical stabilizer has been found floating some miles away. This time only 228 people were killed. See Yahoo Story: Crews find vertical stabilizer in Air France crash

APTOPIX Brazil Plane

Brazilian Navy recovers Air France vertical stabilizer from Atlantic.

If you read the Yahoo article or any other major media report you understand that they KNOW the plane is not structurally sound. In the Yahoo report they say that an error such as a minor data input glitch fed to the computer can cause major structural failure which kills all the passengers. They KNOW that the structure is not strong enough to survive turbulence and/or computer error or pilot error. They programmed the computer to limit pilot access to rudder control, but they did not make the plane strong enough to hold together when anything goes wrong. They KNOW that a small error will cause the structure to fail with loss of all life on board. That is just not acceptable.

The Airbus A300 and A330 design has an obvious structural flaw that comes apart and kills all the passengers when mid air turbulence is encountered. They are constructed out of cheap light weight plastic parts that are only strong enough to survive in calm air. They save money on every flight, but risk killing the passengers and crew whenever turbulent air is encountered. The Airbus A300 and A330 is UNSAFE to fly.

All A300 and A330 planes should be immediately grounded until major structural changes are made.

In the mean time, if you are planning to fly anywhere,

DO NOT FLY on an A330 or A300."

But the never were grounded. Wonder why it's okay for Airbus to keep flying a clearly defecive craft with no real media scrutiny, but Boeing gets crushed for a far less dangerous issue?

https://bobstruth.blogspot.com/2009/06/airbus-hasnt-fixed-its-vertical.html

"What we are reporting in this article will be of interest to both schools of thought regarding American Airlines Flight 587 (FL587): the majority school – those who believe tail separation was the cause of the crash, and the minority school – those who believe that some other initiating event may have doomed FL587 and led to the subsequent loss of the tail and engines.

As mentioned in our February 23rd article, we continue to work on an article that will outline our findings, concerns, and conclusions at this point in the official FL587 investigation. We have found that many questions have gone unanswered and many areas of investigation remain unexplored; but what is known paints a much different picture than the one portrayed by the official investigation."

http://www.usread.com/flight587/coverups_n_foulups/default.html

Cabal bullshit WRT Boeing 737 MAX, it's about huring the US economy and Trump.

Airbus had planes falling out of the fucking sky in the late 90s and never got grounded, much less the constand media focus of Boeing today.

"For almost five years, one of the world's largest jetmakers knew that the 27-foot-tall tail fin on one of its jets had almost snapped off in flight.

Officials with manufacturer Airbus understood that losing a tail fin would prove catastrophic. Even so, they kept their concerns to themselves until after a tail fin did break off one of its jets, causing the second worst aviation disaster in U.S. history."

https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-05-26-a-cover_x.htm