Check out approx. minute 21:
Turns out the principle
"Whatever they accuse you of…."
Democrat Admin used thugs / National Socialists as part of their Coup scheme in Ukraine
I remember this was reported at the time! But with no fanfare.
The same thing they constantly accuse POTUS DJT of being? Their allies actually were?
https://youtu.be/9qcLFtZaxHk
>>7630227 pb
look at 4:18
What is that red line being traced on the border of the screen to our right, when Solomon is speaking
Is that a com? If I was John S. that would make me very nervous
WTF are they doing?
Nature / Universe is perfect.
Your arguments about biological life are very good.
"How could there be a Creation without a Creator?"
Isn't it logical to think that the "special conditions" of what we witness and experience as our context/environment are not coincidental, but are in fact deliberate?
Would it be that our little corner was so unusual or is there something life-like "divine" elsewhere?
Isn't it logical that there would be?
Universe is so vast compared to our home.
What are the chances planetary life on Earth began by random mixing of dirt - compared with descending from reaches of larger home "Space" ?
"Adreno 420"?
that would be Notable Baker?
"42" = meaning of Life
or "To Die"?
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=42
"42 = The Meaning of Life
Because if you add all the sides of a dice it equals 21, which is also half of 42. So 2 die go into 42, die being the plural of dice; Therefore the meaning of life equals 42 and 42 equals 2 die or 'to die'.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=42
"The Almighty Answer to the Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything. "
"To Die" Ultimate meaning of Life ?
Look at all the fours.
CORN-er?
Right = Justice ?
Cardinal is first?
That would be cool. He's always on TV with that stupid supercilious smirk.
That would be the advantage to his fame fagging; everybody is familiar with him.
He lies so bold too.
Would be easy to show it?
They 've done it a bit on Fox, that I have seen.
Shown what he said compared to OIG
But it could really be drummed heavy.
What channel would do it though?
Fox would become even more-so the number one TV channel?
The taller they are, the harder they fall?
I'm filtered so dude can't read what I'm saying about him.
"MUH - oh I just filtered you, aren't I cool"!
FilterFameFags.
Considering I don't think QResearch is strictly a LARP, though the Perps would love you to think it is.
Why would they care?
So I don't put too much by that prediction.
The claim is that POTUS and his team would refrain until DJT received the vote of the people.
But there are many other ways it could unfold.
Also, Never say Never.
If much corruption comes public? All bets are off; could happen anytime;
First Media exposure
Then arrests follow?
yes, but you are just an anon person here.
We need more than
"My Dad was there. My Dad needed money"
The anecdotes don't work.
It's a too overused ploy to bolster credibility of "events" which we know were simulated.
Sorry that you are angry.
Maybe take some anger management?
You don't have to read here, ya know.
And your Dad did get paid after all; shouldn't you be grateful for that regardless of what a small minority believe?
The whole culture believes in Moon Landing including DJT Trump, so why come here an bitch over imaginary people who think contrary.
If it was all true, why would you care what a fringe contingent said or thought? Compared with everything else promoted here, Like FE
?
I noticed NYTimes never has sauce either; But others still use NYTimes, itself, as supposedly some of the best sauce by itself. Even though they are proven liars and proven politically interested.
Some things with no direct sauce per citation can be proved by logic.
Some direct sauce (a publication allegedly sound) doesn't itself have any sauce?
"It's turtles all the way down"
At some point you will find everything is based upon assumptions of some sort or another.
And that everything can be questioned and doubted.
yeah, but that article about the missile, a missile-scare, was not a mistake
Also, once they are proved bold lying, such as the NYTimes, who is being sued as it is[?], they should never be used as sources again, especially if they do it over and over, such as the NYTimes and never provide any apology or retraction which seems sincere.
They are already caught lying about Hugh Events important to our Republic,
And continuing the lies and cover ups for FIFTY years.
JFK
2 RFK
MLK
Iran - Contra
Cover up of all the cover ups is also blacked -out
October Surprise
7 Bush W. corruption of SCOTUS to be installed POTUS
9/11
Obama ID failed to be vetted.
Illegal wars
Corruption that Media sources themselves take part in
An anon who witnesses something, maybe records with a camcorder, should have much more credibility than NYTimes or WaPo or any of them - who have already discredited themselves many times over.
Something could be tagged as "work in Progress" "Developing" "Opinion" [as is done in the "legit" News]
Also, there is the caveat "Notables are not Endorsements" which should allow Bakers to err on the side of inclusion of Anon sourcing, rather than siding with the fucking Fake News orgs.
The Fake News sources should be filtered, shouldn't they?
No I didn't think it through
"indictment" comes when they unseal the case.
"Indictment" sealed means little to the public or to the criminal
The criminal does not even know it's there.
That's why they are parading around on camera, giving interviews, etc.,
The unsealings are after 2019 is over.
that's why it was in brackets
[2019]
No I didn't need to think about it. I saw it in a glance. Very plain.
Whoever wrote the heading on that
"Indictments Coming in 2019?"
Should have been
"Indictments coming after 2019"
I read the body of a news item, not the header. The header very often will not match the body.
thanks, You fixed it.