Anonymous ID: 97a5c1 Dec. 27, 2019, 5:42 p.m. No.7636715   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6779 >>6799 >>6834 >>6976 >>7125

So, carrying on from last bread.

 

Why would Pelosi hold articles, when tying up the Senate in trial would stop them from confirming judges, which Trump is doing at a record pace. 187 judges, Scalia was 187d.

 

My opinion, it something to do with the Supreme Court.

 

Pelosi doesn't want Roberts out of SC to sit in the trial?

 

RGB is dead, and they want to release the articles and the news at the same time, tying up Senate?

Anonymous ID: 97a5c1 Dec. 27, 2019, 6:14 p.m. No.7637028   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7050 >>7057 >>7186

>>7636976

 

WHY IS PELOSI HOLDING THE [2] ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT?

How do you introduce the TRUTH about what happened to the PUBLIC?

What 'value' might exist by attempting to BLOCK 'PUBLIC' testimony/hearings?

Would educating the public through the Senate prior to Barr/Durham/Huber release(s) be important?

 

Maybe they're just afraid of potential witnesses Senate would call, like Schiff, Shokin, Biden etc.

 

But they must have known this before the held the vote.

Anonymous ID: 97a5c1 Dec. 27, 2019, 6:18 p.m. No.7637077   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7637050

They announced Trump has been peached, and the normies lap it up, but technically his isn't peached until articles are given to Senate.

 

Man, if that's the reason, these people are stupit.

Anonymous ID: 97a5c1 Dec. 27, 2019, 6:38 p.m. No.7637288   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7637222

So why even hold the vote, Graham had said he was going to call witnesses before they held the vote.

 

And the vote was purely partisan, so it makes them look even worse.

 

But if they did send the articles over, then the Senate will be tied up and no more judges will be confirmed, which arguably the appeals courts are as important as the supreme court..

 

Q has hinted this is connected with the Supreme Court somehow.